Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The power of creative binded with demonstrative

  1. #1
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    1,305
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default The power of creative binded with demonstrative

    The most fluent thinker type is not the thinker lead type. That type just go the extra hundred miles to be there. The most fluent and best thinker type is that one who got it as demonstrative and creative.

    How important is it really, demonstrative? go with ESE. That person does expression really well, apologies and love, but at the end of the day both SEI and SEE does it better. At least more efficient. What power the lead is that it is always at it. But is it better binded with ignoring element than demonstrative and creative together?

    Shot some thoughts

  2. #2
    back for the time being Chae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    ExFx 3 sx
    Posts
    9,183
    Mentioned
    720 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Agreed! The creative is fluent and flexible by default - especially in the contact subtype - and the demonstrative can back it up flawlessly so you have both introverted and extroverted aspects of either sensing, ethics, logics, intuition. The base function kind of blocks out the other 50% (ignoring function) so there is more rigidity, not the creative's playfulness.

    It's all about range. As you said, SEI and SEE can juggle and at once, while ESE is better off with and at once instead of bringing out their with combined. As far as efficiency is concerned, 4D elements are still the benchmark.

  3. #3
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,267
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Constructive thinker types are always logical creatives base thinkers are emotivists. This is flipped around with ethicals. Interesting juxtaposition. You can see it in real life.
    Which one you want to teach logic heavy stuff? However I see emotivists better at doing same stuff in ethical realm.

    Constructivist

    1. Tend to minimize the emotional elements of interaction, preferring to focus on the 'business' elements.
    2. Have emotional 'anchors' (eg, books, films, places) which they use to support their internal emotional state.
    3. Can become 'emotionally hooked', and can have a strong reaction to a particular part or section regardless of their feelings towards the entirety.
    4. Have greater difficulty disassociating from others' emotions and experiences than from requests for action or consideration.
    5. "I prefer when people offer concrete solutions instead of comfort or sympathy."

    Emotivist

    1. Tend to concentrate foremost on the emotional background of interaction, with 'business' a secondary concern.
    2. Prefer the new and novel over the old and known.
    3. Information perceived as unprofessional or low-quality can leave them indifferent.
    4. Have greater difficulty disassociating from requests for action or consideration than from others' emotions and experiences.
    5. "If a conversation is emotionally negative, I consider it wasted."
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •