Especially mirage. Subtypes definitely come into play when it comes to compatibility in these relations ime, but it really is a much better relation than it is typically portrayed as.
Starting to think that mirage and benefit relations are not so bad after all…
Especially mirage. Subtypes definitely come into play when it comes to compatibility in these relations ime, but it really is a much better relation than it is typically portrayed as.
Platonically, I agree, they're very good ITR. My best friend is an ILE-Ne(H) and I love her to pieces..
Romantically it's terrible!! Even if it seems shiny at first.
Admittedly, the ILEs I dated were never of matching subtype. One was D, the other C.
I think I appreciate non-dual H's a lot because it doesn't feel like their IE usage puts pressure on my own.
Last edited by persimmonism; 04-11-2024 at 02:18 PM.
they support a weak valued function and do not burden on weak non-valued ones, so nope, not bad
mirage also has 3/4 fitting dichotomies
Mirage creates a dual-like chemistry but in the long run it's really annoying to be exposed to your ignoring function constantly. Mirage don't understand or care about each other.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote