Imbalance in romantic relationships of benefit

[Bertrand]

Ive mentioned in the past that Fe views substance in terms of volume so drawing an equivalency there despite all reason makes perfect sense

[Pallas]

Ive mentioned in the past that Fe views substance in terms of volume so drawing an equivalency there despite all reason makes perfect sense

I was mostly referring to the relentlessly convoluted style.

[Bertrand]

I was mostly referring to the relentlessly convoluted style.

would it have been as voluminous had it not been convoluted?

now you know the difference between my posts and the one in question

edit: actually this is really unfair to @Theoria and I apologize

i imagine I look at this post through the lens of low res Fi and high res Te and try to abstract out the Te, and when I do that I'm left with a cheeky one liner, but that doesn't mean that's all there is to this. there is a ton of Fi content, and in the same way I think of my long posts as necessitating every word and everything having a shade of this or that meaning, i imagine the same rings true here in a Fi sense

so I'm sorry i let my haste in replying to wyrd short shrift your contribution