Extraversion/introversion - Keirsey vs. Jung

[Petter]

Yes, in the sense that it is an experience flowing into your physical body.
Augusta's definitions of static/dynamic and object/field aren't totally satisfactory but I do believe there is some truth to them.

"...there is some truth to them".

That is far from satisfactory. We get completely distorted descriptions of the types because of that.

I'm not sure what your point is.

You italicized 'information'. What did you mean?

Why doesn't it work? The information that a football is flying through the air is objective information about the physical world, hence Se. The information that the football hurt your head by hitting it is part of your subjective experience of the physical world, hence Si. I think you're reading too much into it. Se and Si are both subjective faculties but that doesn't mean that their information is equally subjective.

Se corresponds to external statics of objects in mainstream Socionics (SSS definitions are different as you probably know). A football flying through the air is about "objective" information, yes. So far so good. But it is also about dynamic information. That is why it doesn't work.

SRSI thinks action/movement is processed by Te, which is true. But we need a perceiving function that processes action/movement as well.

---------

Furthermore, are these two definitions really equal? For example, there are two bananas in front of you, and you compare their sizes and shapes. Is that comparison about objective or subjective information?

"Objects: Things that can be observed, studied, and discussed apart from the subject (observer)

Fields: Things that are perceived through the subject by means of feelings and cannot be studied apart from the subject"

"Information aspects about objects are called extraverted.
Information aspects about relationships are called introverted."