Hello Chae,
no, this is not an geman joke. I only quoted a famous statement from the Monty Pythons.
Es wurde immer mit "Und nun zu etwas völlig anderem" in Deutsch übersetzt.
My type: Im not sure, but I'm either LII-Ne or ILE-Ti.
Vicco von Bülow, or better known as Loriot: EII or IEE?
I only say: Jodeldiplom or Kosakenzipfel
My favorite anime series as child: Captain Future
Curtis Newton, aka. Captain Future: LII-Ti (he is basically a detective that solves criminal cases and finds solutions to technical problems)
Prof. Simon Wright, the living brain: LII-Ti
Otto, the biological android with shapeshifting ability: SEE
Greg, the robot: SEI (SEI seems unlikely for a robot, but he takes care for the whole crew and expresses emotions like a Fe user)
Last edited by WinnieW; 09-22-2017 at 11:06 PM.
My ansers to some old posts in this thread
Yes, Fe is his dominant function, the only other option would be EIE for him.
But ESE does make the most sense for him.
Michelle Hunziker is very likely also ESE. Michelle could be a 3w2 type
Yes, I agree, IEE for him.
I see her as Fe-user too.
Dieter Bohlen is LIE imho.
I wouldn't rule out IEE, because he make a lot of value judgements.
I agree. (Heavy use of Ne + Ti)
I see a problem typing people that play a role on stage, because they can apear as a completly different type while presening a already written script.
heute show and extra 3 both have a lot of Ne moments, but this is intentional. Keep in mind, the texts and illustrations in the show are from autors, not from the presenters.
I prefer typing people while doing interviews, not stage performances.
Opportunity to brush up my rusty skills in english language.
A example for a german youtuber that performs ILE in front of the camera, based on interviews although he is far less outgoing, maybe LII.
...an the german TV show "Genial daneben" is a basicly a firework of extraverted intution.
...bringing a thread that remained in stasis back to life again...
I decided to post a video from a german youtuber here, because he made a video about the subject Big 5
This is only available in german language, no english subtitles
Still figuring out his type. He is at least 60 years old, retired from his old job. He studied aerospace engineering; he told that fact in an other video.
I guess "that color test" he made and mentioned in the video is DISC
Came here to throw a German classic in, politician Gerhard Schröder. SEE! He recently pressured Erdogan into releasing human rights activist Peter Steudtner.
Here is an interesting interview. - values first, and after 3 min comes the .
SEE does make sense for Gehard "hol' ma' 'ne Flasche Bier, sonst streik ich hier" Schröder.
Sky du Mont! Ej incarnate?
EIE would be my idea. He talks a lot about extroverted intuition here:
My impression is that is not a function of his ego. I see him using as either mobilizing or demonstrative function.
But he seems to have a good grip on , so I can not see him as ESE or LSE. xSE has as PoLR-function.
The question is: Is this an interview done spontaneously or a prepared one?
My impression is that he is not ESE and he answered questions that were already known to him.
Maybe he had a lot of training doing interviews. His way of expressing emotions seems not entierly natural to me.
Stereotypicly someone who drives a racing car has to use much of , , and , using , , and does not make much sense on a racing track; maybe use some F-functions for fairness.
Last edited by WinnieW; 10-27-2017 at 07:37 PM.
Maite Kelly - Extrotim, Alpha or Beta Ep imo
Also, Ich glaube LSE oder LIE. Schumacher ist Dominant subtype. Mann muss dass nicht vergessen. Dass "" ist vielleicht nur ein subtype phänomene.
Sorry, maybe he is normalizer after all
is used in the body-machine connection. But it's probably not necessary. I type Kimi Räikkönen SLI (Finnish formula 1 driver)Stereotypicly someone who drives a racing car has to use much of , , and , using , , and does not make much sense on a racing track; maybe use some F-functions for fairness.
I think is very important
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Was ich mir denken kann ist dass sein Ej Temperament mich zu der Schlussfolgerung geführt hat Gulenkos Subtypen interessieren mich nicht, sie lenken schnell vom Wichtigen ab. Was ich mir bei Schumacher nur gut vorstelle ist starkes , weiß nicht wie gut LIE also passt! LSE als Alternative hingegen: gut
Guten Tag meine deutschen Freunde. entschuldigung für mein google übersetztes deutsch. was für ein typ ist helmut kohl?
Last edited by xerx; 06-20-2019 at 02:40 AM.
I don't remember him that well, but I watched a small part of this video just now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLSVcjVuvsU
I highly doubt that he's a LII. I don't want to spend more time analysing him, though. I find him rather boring.
hmm I will probably type him sooner or later. might post an answer in a couple of months
another typing:
Karl Lagerfeld - EIE
Last edited by Still Alive; 07-09-2019 at 04:52 PM.
The famous and immensely successful Michael Schumacher. Maybe E3 or E7. Very sad not to see him again like this:
I think he has strong , some focus. ESE perhaps?
Maite Kelly ESE, but she is in uncomfortable, not relaxed mood in the video.
The three funny extroverts from the eBay Kleinanzeigen channel I love them.
Simon: IEE
Nils: LIE
Hannah: SEE
Matze Knop - strong ? ExFx I suppose. @WinnieW
Sorry, Chae. I'm not interested in typing him, right now. Mainly because I have no clue what his type could be.
Also ich habe Probleme damit ihn als ESE oder LSE zu sehen. Ganz einfach weil beide Typen den wunden Punkt haben.
Ein professioneller Rennfahrer mit schwacher ist für mich schwierig vorstellbar. Als Fahrer eines Rennwagens muss man immer vorausdenken welche Konsequenzen die eigenen Entscheidungen und Handlungen haben; da kann man nicht denken "Kurve voraus, was solls, das wird schon gut gehen!"
Schwaches halte ich für denkbar. Komfort in einem Formel 1 Rennwagen? Sicherlich nicht. Ein solches Cockpit ist eng und unbequem. Wie sich der Wagen für den Fahrer anfühlt ist nicht so wichtig, wichtiger ist das Verständnis wie der Wagen auf der Rennstrecke reagiert bei unterschiedlichen Wetter- und Straßenverhältnissen.
Und da kann ich nur eigentlich nur die passive Komponente von erkennen; damit meine ich dass es nicht um das Wohlbehangen des Fahrers sondern das Fahrzeuges geht.
Ich denke nicht dass für die Benutzung eines Sportgerätes mit maximaler Effizienz wichtiger ist als .
Eine einzige Aufgabe auf "Optimum" zu bringen ist für mich
Es gibt nämlich nicht so viele verschiedene Elemente die hier bedient werden müssen, diese müssen aber mit einer ziemlich hohen Präzision u. Korrektheit bedient werden.
Präzision bzw. Korrektheit sehe ich allerdings eher zu zugehörig als zu
Beim Rennsport gibt es nämlich die sog. Ideallinie, fährt der Fahrer diese mit seinem Wagen dann erreicht dieser als Schnellster das Ziel.
Viele Entscheidungen bei sportlichen Tätigkeiten sind antrainiert und laufen unbewußt ab. Wie bewußt oder unbewußt nutzt man die kognitiven Funktionen?
Last edited by WinnieW; 11-11-2017 at 11:52 PM.
Okay, I'll figure it out later myself.
Ja ich denke wäre beim Rennfahren einfach aus strategischen Gründen sehr wichtig, muss aber nicht jedem erfolgreichen Fahrer inhärent sein. Du hast recht dass das Ganze sehr ungemütlich und stressvoll ist, auch weil die Piloten sich fürs Optimalgewicht runterhungern. Ahh verstehe also ist Logik > Ethik viel wichtiger! Das macht Sinn. Das ist ählich wie der LIE-Boxer, nur in einem Wagen. (Vitali und Wladimir erscheinen mir sehr Gamma) Letzterer scheint mir eher auf ausgerichtet, Aerodynamik, verbesserter Verschleiß et cetera wie du sagst. wären dann die Messungen in der Runde, und eher das Rankingsystem im Allgemeinen.
Im Model A sind manche Elemente bewusst, manche unbewusst wie z.B. die Demonstrative. Kommt also ganz drauf an! Der Egoblock wird bewusst benutzt, dort herrscht große Kontrollfähigkeit. SLE und SEE sind deshalb gut in der Athletik, beispielsweise, merken sich Körperimpulse sehr gut. Usain Bolt ist sicher ein -typ!
squeezing out every last bit of perfomance through repetitions that is in front of you while giving zero mental energy to your internal workings sounds like ideal job for LSE (Michael Shoemaker).
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
His song lyrics gave me the impression he could be NF.
And after more research, I am quite certain of that now.
Not exactly sure which one, but I'd say he is rather Delta NF.
I get the impression he doesn't value Fe. He seems classically "Serious".
This music video of one his most popular/famous/best songs is quite Delta NF as well.
@Olimpia Oh yes. I love "Mensch", it really sums up EII/IEE views on humanity.
Famous German Chefs:
Alfons Schuhbeck - LSE
Steffen Henssler - SEE
Frank Rosin - SLE
Johann Lafer - ?
Gerhard Finke - IEI
Ideas about the AfD?
Kai Pflaume - Ethical base. Social/sexual 2w1.
I say SEI-Fe for Kai Pflaume... with ESE-Si as second option.
Does anybody have an idea for Joseph Ratzinger?
Yes... SLI for J. Ratzinger.