Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Is activation caused by a deficit or surplus in the Mobilizing Function?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Haikus niffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    TIM
    SLE-H 8w9 SX
    Posts
    2,808
    Mentioned
    283 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Um... I think it's because of a surplus of the hidden agenda function being supplied mutually, plus a sense of same quadra understanding.

    Gulenko calls the hidden agenda function the "launcher" function in Model G, iirc. He views the hidden agenda information as what is needed in the environment for someone to "recharge" most instantly and directly.

    This effect of the "hidden agenda" over-energizing is part of why the person you receive benefit from in benefit relations gives you "benefit", and why it's named that. I mean think about it.

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffer View Post
    Um... I think it's because of a surplus of the hidden agenda function being supplied mutually, plus a sense of same quadra understanding.

    Gulenko calls the hidden agenda function the "launcher" function in Model G, iirc. He views the hidden agenda information as what is needed in the environment for someone to "recharge" most instantly and directly.

    This effect of the "hidden agenda" over-energizing is part of why the person you receive benefit from in benefit relations gives you "benefit", and why it's named that. I mean think about it.
    Yup

    Find out who is attractive to you in terms of commonality and energy. Check their type and chances are they are your activity relationship. Dual energy is different. It doesn't relate information on the activation function making it hard for people to understand why that person is their dual and why don't connect seamlessly as activity relations tend to and as conflict and also superego
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •