Block EGO * the 1st pozitsiya*Programmnaya function * the "ethics of relations"
Dostoyevsky attempts to create the most harmonious, most humane, in its idea, form of ethical relations, which prevents the suppression of one personality of another, which prevents conflicts, discord, lack of understanding, mutual distrust.
"thin peace is better than the good quarrel" - the basic form of his ethical strategy.
Entire its life - this is the search for means and possibilities to realize its idealistic system of relations; moreover its own behavior must serve as a positive ethical example.
The consequence of this installation are characteristic for the people of this type the increased introspection, self criticism and constant ethical self-improvement.
High exactingness of itself in Dostoyevsky is combined with the tolerance to the strange weaknesses. Therefore the crisis of relations it "straightens" due to its own concessions, counting, however, that these concessions must be by partner in time noted and it is properly evaluated. In the essence speaking, its concession - this of its kind the ethical method, by which it intends to convince partner of its original benevolence and readiness for compromises.
In fact, its pliability has reasonable limits. And if the demands of partner pass the permissible boundaries, Dostoyevsky renders emotional resistance, erecting between themselves and his disappointed subject the impenetrable psychological barrier.
Dostoyevsky can maintain relations with the psychologically incompatible partner, relying on a feeling of debt and responsibility before the prevailing related and family connections, but in the case of separately unfavorable relations and, being absolutely confident in the impossibility anything in them to correct, irrevocably and unconditionally leaves its partner. (quality, characteristic also to Dreiser.)
A representative of this type, personally not undergone itself the break of interrelations with the partner, as a rule, tries not to allow the gap of family relations, also, in his close ones. (it it will reconcile them until it personally ascertains that the joint stay by them is actually contraindicated.)
The gap of personal close relations Dostoyevsky receives very painfully, especially, when it does not see the real possibility to restore them. For example, if someone of the close ones forces it to break relations with the friend, Dostoyevsky falls into the situation, which contradicts his system of the views: from one side, he betrays friendship, from other side - he does not want to distress his close ones.
To the commandment "do not make to other of that, what you will not wish to itself" Dostoyevsky it relates with exceptional seriousness: it principally does not desire to cause to someone even the least trouble. He tries for each to create the conditions of maximum psychological comfort, each to give presents although by the grain of his sincere heat.
Gentleness, humbleness, condescension to the strange weaknesses, sincere sensitivity, original benevolence and pacifism - here are the basic values of its ethical program.
Systems his interrelations, Dostoyevsky tries to be maximally delicate. For example, he will not allow himself to categorically forego the proposed aid, even if it not only is obviously ineffective, but also it is obviously harmful. (but it is not possible to repulse man, who from the clean heart and from the best motives proposes his services.) The same and with the councils of clearly absurd nature - Dostoyevsky will try to be with the adviser maximally delicate, attentively he will listen, will thank for the sympathy to his problems, but it will enter with respect to circumstances and its own discretion. ("why and not to listen to good council?" - especially because far from each "well-wisher" checks their strict fulfillment) furthermore, Dostoyevsky is capable to receive strange councils not only as guide to action, but also as the form of the expression of sympathy to its difficulties.
Dostoyevsky is very sensitive to the strange misfortune, it is inclined to the mutual anxiety. Has the ability literally to be dissolved in the strange problems, especially, if this of the problem of people close to it.
If, for example, someone from its environment falls ill, Dostoyevsky leaves it with exceptional selflessness, being considered either its own forces or with its health nor with the danger of possible infection. (that family, where is a relative Dostoyevsky, can be completely calm for its health: it is worthwhile for someone to zakhvorat', Dostoyevsky, as a rule, here throws all his matters and leaves patient, the distance of relationship in this case for it a value not having.)
Ability to be anxious to strange grief - one of the basic values of its system of relations. In understanding of Dostoyevsky, the report of comfort by itself already sufficiently active act. (this point of view greatly locates to it those surrounding.)
Dostoyevsky constantly searches for and find some original forms of the expression of sympathy and solidarity with the emotional state of its partner (or its environment). (for example, a representative of this type on occasion of the end of the divorce process of its friend it presented to it bouquet it was color - in this form it it it congratulated since the beginning of the new, "free" life.)
It is very important for Dostoyevsky so that the ethical motivation of his behavior would be correctly understood and correspondingly evaluated. For it any gift, any service present enormous value as the form of the expression of good intentions. The real cost of this service for it means much less while. (its dual Of shtirlits are also given to the gifts purely symbolic value, at least that, which it gives.)
Dostoyevsky knows how to store strange secrets. Therefore to him it is possible to be entrusted without any fear, and of course without the reservation, that "this must remain between us", since in this case Dostoyevsky will insult assumption itself that it is capable to someone to stir strange secret. Itself it also assumes that the secret "its confession" will be piously observed. Therefore any fact of the divulging of its own secrets for it is the heaviest disappointment.
Not capable itself to the treason and the treachery with respect to the neighbor Dostoyevsky condemns these qualities in others. Dostoyevsky never pardons abuse of its confidence, although and it is not rancorous by nature of its.
Being that implicated in some intrigue or falling into relation system, which contradicts its ethical installations, Dostoyevsky feels himself completely lost and disoriented, but in each individual case he tries to behave so that its behavior would not contradict its ethical principles.
Itself greatly fears to offend someone by distrust. Considers distrust insulting for all, including for itself. Good intentions are considered the standard of human interrelations; therefore originally he tries not to assume in the people of bad designs.
Original suspiciousness receives as something unethical and negumannoye. For its the same reason it is sometimes it cannot be convinced of whose- or the fault (even if it is proven and obvious surrounding).
Behavior of Dostoyevsky in the big enough measure are determined by his personal sympathies and antipathies. I.e., if it sympathizes with to man, then he tries to ignore the fact of its fault.
Dostoyevsky is capable of the self-sacrifice in the name of love and friendship, for example, it can take upon himself strange fault, protecting friends from the possible troubles, and because of this itself to suffer.
Dostoyevsky constructs his interrelations with the people on the close distance, which sometimes especially locates to it those surrounding, but sometimes it can seem by obtrusive. (any hint to obtrusiveness he is received by Dostoyevsky extremely painfully, since it least of all intends to tire someone by its society.) In the case of the unfavorable development of relations - it increases distance.
Dostoyevsky in any situation tries to be maximally polite and restrained, whatever efforts it this cost. It does entire possible (and impossible) in order no one not to offend so that you do not give the god! not to gain to itself enemies. He tries not to allow any frank hostility. (erected by it "psychological barrier" considers not as hostility, but as its right "to hold distance" with the the nesimpatichnym to it by man.)
Dostoyevsky is not rancorous (to be rancorous, in his understanding, immorally), but by the first to restore the damaged relations will not decide, until not it is confident, that its offender realized its fault. In order to obtain Dostoyevsky's "forgiveness", it suffices to demonstrate its arrangement to it, moreover apologies to bring not necessarily. The peace of its feelings is so fine and rich that it does not need the verbal expressions of emotions and experiences in order to understand its surrounding interrelations.
Dostoyevsky never forgets the good, which to him they sometimes made, but ingratitude is considered the quality, which deserves most severe criticism.
Kindness and the sympathy- stable values of Dostoyevsky's ethics and it knows how to appear them as no one another. Representatives of this type are inclined to the deep ethical introspection.
The block Of ego*2-ya position is "creative function *" the intuition of possibilities "
To Dostoyevsky it is very difficult to realize its "non-conflicting" system of relations in our contradictory peace. The properties, which rescue and encourage it in this noble field, natural optimism and the strong and flexible intuition of possibilities.
In each person Dostoyevsky tries to see and to reveal positive ethical potential - the quality, because of which the representatives of this type magnificently work in the region of pedagogy. (Dostoyevsky does not understand and does not assume this word combination as the "damaged children". In his understanding, there are no such "damaged children", as were not suggested by a positive ethical example.)
the Ethics- intuitive action Of dosteoyevskogo is constructed on the skill to examine and to develop entire better, that there is in the human soul. By itself, this development requires the expenditure of time, sincere forces. It requires patience. Therefore, in the opinion of Dostoyevsky, educator must constantly work at himself, improving its ethics, bringing up in himself a feeling of debt and responsibility for the fate of the person trusted to it.
In exactly the same manner Dostoyevsky considers that there are no such, originally hopeless ethical relations, which could not be straightened, after using a sufficient resourcefulness, patience, the skill "to wait out thunderstorm", skill to prove the cleanliness of its thoughts, skill to appear the best traits of its nature as a personal example.
Dostoyevsky is sincerely convinced that in each ethical complex situation should be searched for the forms, which smooth out the emergent contradictions. For example, if both sides go to some concessions, this will already give some results and problem will be although partially, it is solved.
The creatively realizable intuition of possibilities makes possible for it to be foresighted and farsighted in its behavior.
Moreover the purpose of its foresight - to foresee the possible complications of relations and to previously exclude them. (for example, a representative of this type, arranging children's holiday, spread entertainment by equal portions, since it feared, that if it this does not make, someone of the invited children will eat more than others, and therefore someone another will feel itself obizhennym and shared unfairly, but this in no case cannot be allowed! For the same reason it did not make possible for its grandsons to carry sweetnesses to the street, since it considered that this will excite offence and envy in other children, but this is bad!)
Conveniences in its surrounding people Dostoyevsky sometimes values more than his own, and he constantly correlates its behavior with their opinion and their means of life.
With entire his optimism Dostoyevsky is capable to farsightedly count the worst course of events and precisely so that personally in it and in his environment everything would be formed by very in the best way. As a result of this intuitive calculation to Dostoyevsky to characteristically reinsure in behavior, which, however, sometimes leads to the positive consequences. (example: the family of the punished "enemy of people" in the expectation of close reference decided to present to the neighborly girl of piano. Neighbor (Dostoyevsky) categorically this prevented and required so that the piano would send back. In its family this episode retells as legend - it is considered that by this act it saved its family from the repressions.)
And nevertheless, whatever strong intuition was in Dostoyevsky, his calculations far from always occur accurate: indeed all circumstances of the matter it neither to see nor know can; especially because frequently it assumes that desired for the real and checks the sometimes imaginary motion of events, but not real, relying on the stereotypes already prevailing in its idea. (for example, in one case it will reconcile the ssoryashchikhsya husbands, fearing, that if it does not interfere, it they will then reproach in the broken personal life. In other case, it not will meddle between ssoryashchimisya in order "not to accept battle upon itself" and not to acquire to itself enemies.)
In each specific case the correctness of calculations and behavior of Dostoyevsky depends on his own life experience and on that, was how deeply he succeeded in understanding situation.
Block SUPEREGO * 3-4 Positions * The developed Function * The "logic Of relationships"
Attempting to carry out his vital destination on the establishment of ideal relations in the world of real contradictions and conflicts, Dostoyevsky tries much and thoroughly to reflect above those circumstances, which interfere with the vital embodiment of his ethical program. Moreover in its reflections it sometimes comes to the conclusion that the real circumstances can be changed under the effect of the "correct" ethical installations, which it is possible (in his opinion) and it is necessary to assign.
Primitively these reflections can be presented thus: "in the world not it will be hostility, if all people are to each other relate well that, in principle, possibly, since in each person there are the advances of good, which it is possible and it is necessary to develop".
(as any person, Dostoyevsky it considers that all all around adhere to its system of views, simply some, on their sincere weakness, they are tempted by the bad examples and fall into the errors, from which they must be derived, or at least to attempt this to make.)
Logician Dostoyevsky it is based on his intuition of possibilities, simply stated - on it dreams and fantasies, and this circumstance gives to it fascinating children's naivete.
But someone must pay for the absence of conflict of relations - objective reality is such, and Dostoyevsky, as a rule, is very unwillingly this recognizes.
To Dostoyevsky it is difficult to subordinate its feelings to reason. To it it is difficult to be objective still and because its system of relations assumes original benevolence to all people without the exception. Because of this quality it can compose about itself impression as about the man unprincipled, inconsistent and itself contradicting: all- that he tries to agree, it is going to be friends with all, it is intended to love all.
It does ask itself, and can Dostoyevsky generally be fundamental? Can! And precisely in its ethical principles. But everything else for it does not have fundamental significance. Dostoyevsky is not too interested in the laws of objective reality. (all the more, if they justify the contradictions existing in the world, which, as is known, pour out into the hostility and violence) this does not completely mean that Dostoyevsky denies laws of the dialectic, simply this aspect he prefers to ignore. And when with the optimism characteristic of him it approaches the search for compromises, it sincerely considers that they, possibly, will smooth if not dialectical, then at least ethical contradictions.
In the contact Dostoyevsky tries to produce the impression of man of clever, reasonable, logical. It frequently manipulates by the previously prepared arguments. (Dostoyevsky is ready to manipulate by facts at least in order to preserve the system of relations necessary to him. But otherwise how to smooth conflicts? Yes even so whether are already important facts themselves, if entire sense consists precisely in the essence of ethical relations. If to avoid conflict it is possible to distort the facts, which possibly and check- that no one not will be, - it means, there is no misfortune in this.)
Frequently in the dispute Dostoyevsky is held for the purely abstract sense of concept, considering that no specific conditions can distort or change his essence. (I this circumstance greatly hampers discussion with the representatives of this type. For example: Dostoyevsky is not agreeable with the opinion that "kindly must be with the cams". But why with the cams, if it - "is kind"? It is kind, in its understanding, this itself already the force, which in any event must conquer, and therefore the protection it does not require. But with the cams there can be only evil, because to it it is more by something to protect.)
In the process of dualization Shtirlitsem Dostoyevsky begins to attach the great significance of objective reality, especially because it, in principle, does not exclude the influence of objective dialectical laws on interrelation system between the subjects.
Block Of superego*ya-ya position * The mobipizatsionnaya function * "volitional sensorika"
Need to postoyat' for itself requires Dostoyevsky excessive efforts and stress. It is incredibly difficult to give to it volitional rebuff.
Dostoyevsky is not capable to the rigid intonation in the voice. To be expressed in the categorical form - for it large problem. Its softness and pliability it is possible to consider and as the consequence of the incapacity to be rigid and categorical.
Dostoyevsky greatly does not love, when his volitional qualities discuss. To it it is unpleasant to hear critical observations in regard to this.
And nevertheless the introduction of the system of its ethical values assumes the specific volitional pressure. Already as soon as Dostoyevsky proclaims the system of views, by which itself solidly and strictly adheres to, this requires from it some volitional efforts. (in this is manifested problematical character and the discrepancy to its own theory - if Dostoyevsky in principle against the violence, then to spread his persuasions by force he simply does not have a right. He not at all has rights to anything, to constrain.)
Dostoyevsky in any event tries to logically base his right to the volitional pressure. If, for example, he as the instructor answers for discipline and attendance of his students, he will force himself to be strict and demanding. (another question, what it this will cost!)
To Dostoyevsky is difficult to pronounce to man anything in a strict form, it is difficult and it is unpleasant to make observation. Each time, when appears the need for postoyat' for itself, it is torn up between the real circumstances, which require from it immediate and decisive actions, and by internal incapacity, by unwillingness and by unpreparedness for these actions.
To Dostoyevsky is sometimes necessary thoroughly substantiated and prolonged attitude to the "decisive actions". Frequently it first of all examines the expediency of such actions, searches for some different versions of the solution of the problems, to consideration of which the time departs, in consequence of which the moment of "decisive actions" occurs missed, and they become unimportant, and to Dostoyevsky is attached the reputation of person, incapable to postoyat' for itself. Moreover with this opinion Dostoyevsky categorically does not desire to agree and attempts to reconvince those surrounding, trying to explain its indecision by the best intentions, which, as a rule, even more greatly aggravates its problems.
Dostoyevsky relates exceptionally painfully to the fact of his own weak will and weakness. To him very it is difficult to be subdued with the fact that these qualities interfere with realization and vital embodiment of its own system of views. To Dostoyevsky it is always unpleasant to realize the fact of its own weak will.
From other side, is completely not tolerated for Dostoyevsky the situation of its own dependence on whose- that of will and authority. And if physical dependence it even some time is suffer (although also, according to the circumstances), then moral pressure it will not obey - "will leave into itself", it will erect "psychological barrier", will find the method to preserve only external visibility of relations, preparing itself for the possible break with the partner.
Dostoyevsky tries not to allow abuse of its patience, by gentleness, by pliability, by humbleness. He understands, that there is a limit to the "suppression of its own pride" and there is a limit to "general pardon". In Dostoyevsky the problems with each appear, who attempts to test the limit of its pliability.
It is very important logically to understand for Dostoyevsky: it is possible for whom and it is necessary to make concessions, and, in addition, to what limit. The logical realization of this moment to it is completely necessary in order to preserve itself as personality.
Piercing power representatives of this type do not possess, by "elbows to work" they do not know how. Moreover, any recommendation to develop in itself energetic nature and persistence leads them into the extreme irritation.
So is matter also concerning the purposefulness. Of course Dostoyevsky constructs some specific plans of the realization of his possibilities, but so as to place to himself the close purpose, which at any cost should be taken, straining to this all its forces and mashing all and entire on its way. This it itself will not allow - this endeavor does not enter into the system of Dostoyevsky's values.
(strange purposefulness can produce impression on Dostoyevsky, but not so that to serve as the example for the imitation: he too distinctly understands, that this is not its way.)
From other side, to Dostoyevsky it is pleasant to be located next to the influential person, it respects people, which succeeded in the life, and itself will not miss the case to tie useful and necessary acquaintances. (especially because for itself it very clearly divides people on those, who correspond to its level and with whom he is worthwhile to associate in earnest, and those, who do not deserve on their internal qualities of this; although, following its system of relations, he tries to be correct and benevolent with all. Some representatives of this type consider by itself being understood, if with the acquaintance of men nenavyazchivo calls that which it profitably distinguishes from others, for example: scientific degree, post, honorable title, etc.)
It is difficult to draw to Dostoyevsky the attention of those surrounding to its problems, without exceeding the scope of its own theory. Periodically appear the blind situations, when even demonstrative humbleness and its patience do not rescue; when by the simple sympathy of those surrounding its problems no longer they are solved, and its own business activity clearly does not be sufficient.
In this situation for Dostoyevsky is extremely necessary the partner, capable of actively taking upon himself the protection of his interests, capable of actively solving its problems, of taking it under his patronage. Dostoyevsky searches for patronages, defender is necessary to it and he does not consider it dishonourable to use the aid, proposed from the clean heart.
Most harmoniously in this plan occurs the mutual understanding Of dosteoyevskogo with his dualom Shtirlitsem, which with the readiness "beret under its wing", greatly loves to be a guardian and by the matter, and by council. In the manifestation of the concern about Dostoyevsky demonstrative volitional sensorika Of shtirlitsa finds its best use.
Block OF SUPERID*SHCH-YA pozitsiya*Suggestivnaya funktsiya*"Delovaya logic"
Concept "business of logician" in Dostoyevsky first of all is reduced to the aspect of business relations.
A question, that also as it is necessary to make, it will answer approximately so: "it is necessary to make that which specifically is required from you, and so that by you they would be contented". Dostoyevsky prefers so that the partner would express his opinion not in the form of reflections, but by clear short formulations, it gave concrete business proposals.
Dostoyevsky is very assiduous, operating. It strictly follows the assigned procedures: as they learned it - so also it will make.
Studying details, Dostoyevsky frequently misses the moment, when work already made sufficiently qualitatively and it is time to stop. It is good, if there is a reliable person, to opinion of which in this situation it is possible to rely. Otherwise, the tendency to bring work to the perfection can lead to the directly opposite results.
Dostoyevsky greatly values the well organized working conditions - one of the reasons, on which to him it is most convenient to collaborate Shtirlitsem (by usually creating for its workers the most convenient conditions for the successful and productive activity).
Dostoyevsky tries to return to the work as many forces, will as require its most meticulous and most qualitative fulfillment. Therefore it can remain, also, to the overtime - in order to finish it in time. (sometimes this the only method to carry out the exorbitant volume of work, assigned Shtirlitsem)
To Dostoyevsky it is usually "inconvenient" to reject the increment loads; therefore they frequently exploit him.
To Dostoyevsky it is very important so that his business enthusiasm would be properly evaluated. To the leader, who demonstratively ignores its exceptional zeal, it either entrust or sympathize with not will be never. Moreover, such relations in the course of time will affect the results of its work and on its working discipline.
The work, which it considers too primitive for its abilities, intellect, position, also causes a feeling of internal protest. The commission of this work it receives as personal offence.
Dostoyevsky usually does not love to scrupulously check the results of the work: let the competent and reliable partner this better make. But if there is no such person, it is necessary personally to be certified, which everything is made as must.
Reporting for the accomplished work, special attention in the deficiencies and the unresolved problems accentuates, thus giving to understand that it can make still better.
A feeling of solidarity in his business relations is very important for Dostoyevsky. Moreover not only with the colleagues, but also with the management. If its leader at least even "plays" into democracy, to Dostoyevsky this already completely sufficiently.
Dostoyevsky about his business qualities of very modest opinion; therefore is always grateful "for the prompt". Greatly he is suggested by councils for business logic. It sometimes even relates to them noncritically. If, for example, to it someone "prompted", that it is necessary to store post receipts, it will store, until itself considers, that this to it is not necessary.
It is always very attentive to the business recommendations. If to it is recommended the commercial firm, whose goods road, but are practical, it will buy there. (but Dostoyevsky can be sometimes seen and on the cheap sale, and in "komissionkakh", where it also searches for to itself inexpensive, but high-quality things.)
The maintenance of order in the house requires of it many forces (as it is good, if by this was occupied someone another), but if no this other - was forced everything to make itself.
It does not suffer in the house of excess, unnecessary things, and all that from its point of view it no longer possesses any value - them mercilessly ejects but that, from its point of view, presents some value although, with great care is stored in the house. Dostoyevsky knows how to be economical, knows how to value the fact that he has.
Dostoyevsky does not love to deal, but he will not miss the possibility to timidly inquire, it is not possible to reduce price. And if it is possible, it is very delicately about this will ask.
To take money into the debt Dostoyevsky does not love, but itself with the readiness gives on loan (if can) fairly often to it it is difficult to exact from the debtor if this small sum, it can even be subdued to its loss, but if this is large debt, Dostoyevsky will find the method delicately and nenavyazchivo to resemble about it. "those 300 dollars, that 4 to you it lent, can thus far hold to the following month".
Dostoyevsky is always grateful to the partner, who is capable to prompt to it, that necessary to make and as one should enter in each concrete situation. It will not arrange general phrases about how must or as not necessary to live (feature, characteristic of its konflikteru to Zhukov) this approach to the solution of the vital problems of Dostoyevsky only irritates.
Another matter, when for each concrete occasion it obtains clearly adjusted, repeatedly checked and maximally clearly and methodically presented recommendations, which it can with the complete confidence apply as guide to action. Specifically, in this foreshortening it obtains information from its duala Of shtirlitsa, and precisely of this type information to Dostoyevsky is necessary constantly and is extremely for it important.
Block OF SUPERID*'-YA the pozitsiya*Aktivatsionnaya Function * "sensorika Of sensations"
Are observed definite difficulties in representatives of this type with the improvement of their own way of life, although, it goes without saying, Dostoyevsky can be trained to maintain order in the house and it will relate by the most honest means to this its new responsibility.
In the field of aesthetics in representatives of this type also far from all proceeds satisfactorily; therefore they with the appreciation assume any aid and any information on this aspect. A representative of this type can entire life live side by side with the partner -sensorikom and nevertheless in the region of sensory sensations he will make blunders, if we him do not learn as to avoid them.
Representatives of this type frequently are indifferent to their exterior view. Their basic requirement for itself: not to be separated and not to dress provocatively. The main thing - not to irritate by its form of those surrounding and not in whom not to excite excess emotions; therefore they try to dress modestly, inconspicuously, conveniently and neatly. Greatly they fear bright color combinations, prefer calm, neutral tones.
Women of this type prefer to appear naturally and therefore very unwillingly use cosmetic. Many of them appear considerably older than its age, since any efforts rarely apply, in order to appear younger.
The difficulties also appear with the culinary searches in representatives of this type. Very frequently in their articles oshchushchayetsya "nedovlozheniye" or "sorting" of some ingredients. It occurs, that they prepare too lenten a food, because they fear high caloricity or economize on the products. It is vice versa - excessively fatty food is prepared, because otherwise in them everything scorches.
Frequently they entrust to not so much their taste, their as knowledge: "4 I do not know, it is how much necessary for salt to this quantity. 4, of course, I can salt, well and if this then seems to someone by too salt?.." However, as a rule, by their failures in this region they do not especially confuse also the design observations and councils, made in the delicate and benevolent form, listen with the readiness.
Dostoyevsky prefers to conduct the healthy means of life, to be occupied by sport, to follow the feed mode, his health. And nevertheless to it is always necessary someone, whom would interest the state of his health.
Dostoyevsky greatly values, when someone worries by another about his comfort, about his nourishment. To it it is necessary that someone would create to it the cosiness and from time to time it would recall that it it does not prevent from care, also, about itself.
Specifically, such partner for it is Shtirlits, from nature allotted by excellent taste, which knows how to create cosiness and to worry about its close ones. Shtirlits magnificently solves the everyday and aesthetical problems of Dostoyevsky.
Block ID*"-ya position * observant function * the" ethics of emotions "
Sphere of the observation of Dostoyevsky - the emotion of man, his feeling, the state of his soul.
Dostoyevsky always very thinly notices mood, sincere state, feelings and experiences of man. The sense of words themselves in this case for it no value has. It is convinced only by fact that personally it observes, i.e. by the mimicry of man and by his intonations.
Dostoyevsky knows how to adapt his emotional state to emotions and experiences of another person. It knows how to remove irritation, stress, knows how to quiet.
He tries not to tie his own emotions in the contact, since it is anxious first of all to the emotional state of others. With the sad it is sad, with the merry - oars. It considers that to spoil to man mood - means, to offend it, to enter with it immorally. (in Dostoyevsky generally on this score its theory. For example, if man made unsuccessful purchase, it about this to speak one ought not: nevertheless indeed you will already nothing repair, but mood in man can be spoiled, but this is bad.)
Dostoyevsky will not allow himself to be for someone the source of the unpleasant emotions: loves no one namerenno to irritate or to tease. Moreover, it will allow no one of its close ones to irritate or to tease others.
Dostoyevsky is not rancorous, not envious. He sincerely is glad at strange successes and successes. It is not jealous and it is very trusting. But to misuse by its confidence - it means, to severely it. Disappointment in the people very heavily survives.
In the love and in the friendship it is characterized by exceptional devotion and selflessness.
He tries so that its own troubles would not spoil the relations prevailing around it; therefore in the expression of its negative emotions it is very careful. Rather it will complain itself to the outside person, than to close one. Rather it will in exactly the same manner express its deep fears and problems to stranger.
Sympathizing and being anxious to other, the maximum of time and patience manifests. Condolence is expressed always in the very tactful and delicate form in order not to irritate strange pain. It will always patiently calm down the weeping person, it will give to it to sob, without calling to the restraint and without requiring "taking itself in the hands".
Its own grief tries to transfer with fortitude and not to advertise. (with the age to representatives of this type to with more difficulty hold in control its negative emotions.)
Dostoyevsky does not usually place to himself the task to cheer up someone or to make laugh, he tries to support flat mood in those surrounding.
Hot temper and irritation will appear only in the most exceptional case - only being deeply uyazvlennym. As the form of contact is considered for itself inadmissible.
Always condemns coarse tone and unceremonious behavior.
It does not suffer slander, he always tries it to suppress in the soft, tactful form. Usually it does not gossip and "bone it does not wash up again", even in order to support conversation. This quality in others condemns. Even if it considers it necessary something to say about the man, he always thinks about the consequences of his information.
It is very sentimental. The melodrama, in which the good conquers evil, its favorite genre. Greatly it loves the multiple series television seriess, in which act the characters with the natures clearly expressed in the ethical plan. ("ah, what it good, this Izaura, and it - this scoundrel!)
Block ID * the eighth position * demonstrative function * the "intuition of time"
Dostoyevsky attaches special importance to the circumstances of time, since subconsiously he is called "to attend" the weak intuition of the time of his duala Of shtirlitsa. (several lines, arbitrarily undertaken from the story Of f. m. Dostoyevsky "sleep of ridiculous person", convincingly illustrate the significance of time factor for the representatives of this psychological type of:"... Truth I learned in the past November, and precisely third November, and each instant my I remember from that time 4. This was in the gloomy, gloomiest evening, such as only can be. I returned then in the eleventh to the hour of evening home, and precisely, I remember, I thought that already it cannot be gloomier time.")
Assigning encounter, Dostoyevsky tries as it is possible to more precisely discuss all circumstances of time and place so that it would arise no confusion and in order no one not to force to await. (Dostoyevsky it does not love to make it necessary to await and it does not love, when it they force to await.)
Some of the representatives of this type possess phenomenal memory and they can even at the old age in detail to describe the events, which occurred with them in the early childhood, consecutively remembering all circumstances in minute detail.
To planning of his and strange time Dostoyevsky relates very seriously. For example, he can forego the advantageous, but lasting contract, fearing, that in this period in his plans can occur the changes and it will not be able to fulfill the undertaken itself obligations.
With his entire dreaminess and estrangement, never he forgets about the encounters assigned and the planned matters. Moreover, it constantly reminds others about the fact that and when it is necessary to make. Sometimes is created impression, that this not of men, but "walking hours": "already poldevyatogo, why you still house?!", "now already seven it is hour, to you it is time to assume medicine!", "do not forget, it requested to perezvonit' to noon!", "today the eighth number, do not forget to tomorrow pay for the apartment".
He tries everything to do in proper time, even demonstratively in proper time: "it is necessary to arrive earlier, and that suddenly it will arrive earlier and it will be disturbed, that still we are not!"
Dostoyevsky suffer hurries cannot, he tries to maximally accurately calculate the operating time, in order to carry out task accurately in time. If some objective circumstances force it to introduce correctives into their plans, it will mobilize all forces in order not "to be knocked out from the graph". To be deflected from its "graph" it can only, if this is required in the interests of its personal relations. (for example, if its friends are required aid and sympathy precisely when it makes urgent work, Dostoyevsky will prove to be in the extremely difficult situation.)
Dostoyevsky is beret to himself the concern about the order of the day of his partner. If partner has a habit, being fascinated by work, to forget about leisure, Dostoyevsky, as the brought hours, will in time recall that time to already and rest and to eat up. If partner is not suggested by his reminders, Dostoyevsky uses decisive measures. (he uses decisive measures and when someone of his close ones sharply differs from the normal and healthy regime of the day: "usually during the school vacations grandmother for us made possible to be spilled later, and us it pleased itself to experience her, how much it will permit us to lie along time in the bed. And here, when came "critical time", grandmother, usually already angered, was dug in into our bedroom and "woke" us in a most decisive manner, although by nature he was man by very soft and delicate ".)
Dostoyevsky is always irritated, if someone is not considered his personal time. Itself it never will allow itself by strange time to abuse. (grandmother, of the given above example, especially it serdilas' to its grandsons for the fact that in the expectation of their "awakening", it was necessary on several times to heat by it breakfast, while in it there was another mass of other planned matters.)
Dostoyevsky's concern about the time of his surrounding people - this first of all the form of the expression of its relation to them, this indispensable condition of his ethical program, ethical accordion with the partner.
To give time to man so that you soak to it, to support, to comfort it, to sympathize with it, this is, in understanding of Dostoyevsky, the large and generous gift, which already itself speaks for itself. And precisely this gift best anything is evaluated by its dualom Shtirlitsem.