Delta Atheism

[AbZero]

I'm not sure I understand why Delta Quadra wouldn't value what is true. Te is concerned with factual accuracy and that's a valued function of the Delta Quadra. In my view, the lack of evidence in favor of religion is sufficient to not believe. I do think that Deltas would likely also focus on the morality of it as well, especially the ethical types

[Saoirse]

I'm not sure I understand why Delta Quadra wouldn't value what is true. Te is concerned with factual accuracy and that's a valued function of the Delta Quadra. In my view, the lack of evidence in favor of religion is sufficient to not believe. I do think that Deltas would likely also focus on the morality of it as well, especially the ethical types

Of course we value truth, but we value useful, knowable truth. I think we dislike endless debates over philosophical ideas, since we can't just bring in observable facts to win the debate. I agree that any individual religion lacks evidence/is inconsistent/cannot be literally true, but I don't think there is or can be any observable factual evidence in favor of or against the existence of God.

Totally agree about morality, I think that is one practical part of religion/the lack thereof that Deltas care about.

[chwoey]

I'm not sure I understand why Delta Quadra wouldn't value what is true. Te is concerned with factual accuracy and that's a valued function of the Delta Quadra. In my view, the lack of evidence in favor of religion is sufficient to not believe. I do think that Deltas would likely also focus on the morality of it as well, especially the ethical types

I am pretty sure I am also an SLI and I completely agree with you. I would argue it makes very little sense for there to be a God and that is the reason I am athiest. No evidence or logical rationale for God.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

I'm not sure I understand why Delta Quadra wouldn't value what is true. Te is concerned with factual accuracy and that's a valued function of the Delta Quadra. In my view, the lack of evidence in favor of religion is sufficient to not believe. I do think that Deltas would likely also focus on the morality of it as well, especially the ethical types

The key I think is that "god" is supposed to be the epitome of what is good, thus if we are unable to perceive a being with such properties in our lives or cannot believe the universe to be the creation of such a being, we may think along the lines of the famous argument attributed to Epicurus:

"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?"

And consider also the Euthyphro dilemma (in Plato's Euthyphro dialogue - although Plato himself may not have been Delta!): "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?"

[Beautiful sky]

I'm not sure I understand why Delta Quadra wouldn't value what is true. Te is concerned with factual accuracy and that's a valued function of the Delta Quadra. In my view, the lack of evidence in favor of religion is sufficient to not believe. I do think that Deltas would likely also focus on the morality of it as well, especially the ethical types

Morality is love

[Grendel]

Shrek is love

Fixed that for you.

[Beautiful sky]

Fixed that for you.

Hehehe