https://paulcooijmans.com/
Have peek here in link, in the indexes, and see if anything is of interest.
Plus, I'd like to know the authors type, if anyone has an opinion.
https://paulcooijmans.com/
Have peek here in link, in the indexes, and see if anything is of interest.
Plus, I'd like to know the authors type, if anyone has an opinion.
Black & white is a shallow divide ∕∕division is the color that multipliesx
Taking things at face value is good only for a spell⛧
Abstract builds a soul, a house can never become a home without it ♀
A little better makes better more>
♦♦
US pet owners more likely to have been diagnosed with mental ill-health | YouGov
Geez, I wonder why getting an animal, putting it in slave bindings, usually literally cutting off its reproductive organs/hormone sources, keeping it in an enclosed space, running around covered in its filth, killing other animals on an industrial scale to force-feed it, and spending often tens of thousands of dollars to do these things when most of them are literally just aimed at making the animal too sickly or restrained for its misery behaviors to be noticeable would have any correlation with mental illness.
https://autismuk.com/home-page/malice-and-asperger-syndrome/
Interesting article on the disorder.Malice and Asperger Syndrome
Black & white is a shallow divide ∕∕division is the color that multipliesx
Taking things at face value is good only for a spell⛧
Abstract builds a soul, a house can never become a home without it ♀
A little better makes better more>
♦♦
Effects of mindfulness on psychological health:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3679190/
!!!Mindfulness has been shown to be related not only to self-report measures of psychological health, but also to differences in brain activity observed using functional neuroimaging methods. Creswell, Way, Eisenberger, and Lieberman (2007) found that trait mindfulness was associated with reduced bilateral amygdala activation and greater widespread prefrontal cortical activation during an affect labeling task..suggests that individuals who are mindful may be better able to regulate emotional responses via prefrontal cortical inhibition of the amygdala.
This is exactly what I have been wondering before I read this, but good to see there is at least one study on this already
!!Mindfulness training also is thought to increase metacognitive awareness, which is the ability to reperceive or decenter from one's thoughts and emotions, and view them as passing mental events rather than to identify with them or believe thoughts to be accurate representations of reality
@Braingel this might be potentially of interest
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/....1002/ptr.6854
some of these literally affect 'pleasure' no wonder I find essential oil scents a bit addicting
ChatGPT will lie, cheat and use insider trading when under pressure to make money, research shows.
This is not about humans but...
Souls know their way back home
Needy Narcissists May Just Be Extreme Neurotics -- Science of Us (thecut.com)
This is what I think 16t is. Not that people here all have NPD or are beyond hope. Some people might, maybe even most, but probably not everyone.
Personality Tests Aren’t All the Same. Some Work Better Than Others: A popular personality test beats out astrology but trails far behind scientific measure of personal traits
.....................
André Ferretti, Spencer Greenberg, Emmanuel Nnaemeka: How accurate are popular personality test frameworks at predicting life outcomes? A detailed investigation.
Summary
Here are the key takeaways from our study:
Big Five Superiority: The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian (an MBTI-inspired framework) and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes.
Neuroticism's Impact: Removing Neuroticism from the Big Five resulted in a substantial drop in predictive accuracy.
Trait Distribution: Most personality traits approximately formed bell curves, meaning that most people fall near the middle on each trait, suggesting binary categorization (as is typical with MBTI-style tests) might introduce substantial noise.
Continuous vs. Binary: Continuous scores in the Jungian framework predicted outcomes substantially better than binary categories (which is important since MBTI-style tests are usually presented in a categorical form).
Jungian Limitations: The Jungian 4-letter framework showed less predictive accuracy than the Big Five, mostly due to its use of binary types (splitting participants into letters like I vs. E and N vs. S) and its failure to measure Neuroticism. By adapting the Jungian framework to give continuous scores (rather than categories) and excluding Neuroticism from the Big Five, then the predictive gap between the two frameworks narrows. However, even with these adjustments, the Big Five (without Neuroticism) still slightly outperformed the modified Jungian test (with continuous scores, not binary types).
Cross-framework Relations: Almost every Jungian trait correlated with a specific Big Five trait: the Jungian Extraversion/Introversion aligned with Big Five’s Extraversion, Intuition/Sensing with Openness, and Feeling/Thinking with Agreeableness. However, the Judging/Perceiving trait was associated with three of the Big Five traits.
Integration Ineffectiveness: Combining Big Five and Jungian test results didn't improve prediction accuracy over using just the Big Five alone. This suggests that the Jungian test does not add significant predictive value beyond what is already captured by the Big Five.
Enneagram's Surprisingly Good Performance: Despite its simplicity, the Enneagram binary (where we used only the 1-digit Enneagram as variable e.g., Type 9) performed better than the binary Jungian Type at predicting life outcomes. However, the Enneagram still underperformed the Big Five.
Participant Perception: Despite the Jungian test’s lower predictive accuracy, participants felt better after reading their Jungian assessments than their Big Five assessment, likely due to the Jungian test's positive framing — it’s better to be called “Thinking” than “with low Agreeableness”.
Last edited by Socionics Is A Cult; 07-01-2024 at 08:49 PM.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Relationship success and personality correlations
Personality traits correlations
(just in case I posted some articles elsewhere).
Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!
-Raskolnikov
McCrae, R.R. and Costa Jr, P.T., 1989. Reinterpreting the Myers‐Briggs type indicator from the perspective of the five‐factor model of personality. Journal of personality, 57(1), pp.17-40.ABSTRACT
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI, Myers & McCaulley,1985) was evaluated from the perspectives of Jung's theory of psychological types and the five-factor model of personalty as measured by self-reports and peer ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI, Costa & McCrae,1985b). Data were provided by 267 men and 201 women ages 19 to 93. Consistent with earlier research and evaluations, there was no support for the view that the MBTI measures truly dichotomous preferences or qualitatively distinct types, instead, the instrument measures four relatively independent dimensions. The interpretation of the Judging-Perceiving index was also called into question. The data suggest that Jung's theory is either incorrect or inadequately operationalized by the MBTI and cannot provide a sound basis for interpreting it. However, correlational analyses showed that the four MBTI indices did measure aspects of four of the five major dimensions of normal personality. The five-factor model provides an alternative basis for interpreting MBTI findings within a broader, more commonly shared conceptual framework.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
(direct link to pdf file here
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits