For the Harry Potter fans among us! What's your house?
If you don't know or haven't consulted the Sorting Hat yet --> create a quick account on Pottermore and then take the test.
My result (Hufflepuff people please get into my zone )
For the Harry Potter fans among us! What's your house?
If you don't know or haven't consulted the Sorting Hat yet --> create a quick account on Pottermore and then take the test.
My result (Hufflepuff people please get into my zone )
Last edited by Chae; 07-18-2017 at 02:07 PM.
gryffindor. and in the new sorting quiz: thunderbird.
What are characteristics of the other two houses, ravenclaw and jigglypuff?
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Oh, was griffindor. Eat a dick, rivals.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
I got Slytherin.
That's good, right?
?
It doesn't sound so good. I sounds kind of... reptilian, to be honest.
Why couldn't I be Griffindor? That sounds much nicer. It sounds like Griffins, and Doors.
My family crest has Griffins on it. Does this mean I'm really not part of my family?
Who made this test?
Gryffindor.
There's another sorting system somewhere where you get two houses: one for your morals and one for your style of influence upon the world. I got Gryffindor morals and Slytherin influence, which makes more sense to me, rather than being a bloody Gryffindork. *sigh* *puts on a snake and tries to look ambitious*
Reason is a whore.
Well - the Sorting Hat, in theory, sorts you into the house that has values you endorse. This test gives you an idea of your inclination. Rowling wrote the questions herself. If you want to join the Gryffs, go ahead You seem more brave than ambitious/cunning either way so it should be a good fit.
@Chae: Why are you fond of Hufflepuffs?
[such derail][sue me]
Reason is a whore.
How Gryffindor of you I actually like this discussion. To me it's an unspoken agreement that Gryffindor x Ravenclaw and Slytherin x Hufflepuff are the alliances. Ravenclaw the resources and brains to the Gryff strength, Hufflepuff the comfort for the tortured go-getter snake souls
The first time I took the Pottermore test years ago (first version), I got Hufflepuff and was very disappointed.
The last time I took it, which was around the end of last year, I got Gryffindor.
To be exact, I'd be a hybrid of Gryffindor and Ravenclaw... Something like Gryffenclaw.
So, if I lived in the Harry Potter world...
I'd be sorted into Gryffindor, but also hang out with Ravenclaws a lot, and engage in many of their favourite activities.
When I was a kid, I always felt like I was a Gryffindor.
As I got older, I felt more like I was Ravenclaw – probably because of Type 5-ish reasons.
Now, it's like I said... Gryffindor at heart with very Ravenclaw-like tendencies.
Similar to Hermione Granger, technically, who supposedly should have ended up in Ravenclaw.
Meh, you could argue that Ravenclaw/Slytherin vs Gryffindor/Hufflepuff forms the axis of Cold Bastards ('Think, You Moron') vs Warm-hearted Heros ('We Must Save The Children') respectively. You could also argue that Gryffindor/Slytherin vs Ravenclaw/Hufflepuff forms the axis of Is Relevant vs Irrelevant, as per the books, or the axis of BrbSavingTheWorld vs MakingTheWorldGoRoundWouldYouLikeSomeTea. You can then argue that Gryffindor/Ravenclaw vs Slytherin/Hufflepuff is yet something else, and THEN you can go crazy and put socionics on it: R/S = T-ego, G/H = F ego - G/S = Sensing, R/H = iNtuition or alternatively Extroversion and Introversion respectively - etc.
And none of it will ever be particularly useful or defendable as an argument, outside of It's My Opinion/Headcannon™
Meaning that this is the most F-ego thread ever and you should probably be at the opposite end of the axis of 'Cold Bastards vs Warm Heros', and be in Gryffindor or something. Oh snap.
Reason is a whore.
Ravenclaw, which I think would suit me best.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
@Chae: I am honoured that your 1700th post was spent respecting me, but I really was looking for a friendly fight ;_; Thank you though ^^
(As an aside, if at any time I'm bothering you shoot me a message and I'll stop, no questions asked. )
Reason is a whore.
Ravenclaw
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I took a different test because I didn't want to join the page.
I got Ravenclaw.
Attachment 10528
In a nutshell, they are the smart researcher club.
Hehe look @Director Abbie joined! Suits you very well.
Slytherin, although I obviously over-ambitiously started the Slytherin group here. I think Ravenclaw would also be OK since the riddles and such sound fun, but I wouldn't even vaguely fit into a house full of Weasleys or a house known for being doormats (or, less commonly, the positive version of doormats). I also think Slytherin + Ravenclaw and Gryffindor + Hufflepuff are the canon alliances, basically dark and mysterious vs. open and warm, but during the books everyone gets ticked off at Slytherin for being Voldemort and Malfoy (vs. during other times when it has people like Merlin in it).
I don't know about Chae, but I like it whenever anyone says they're a Hufflepuff because it's considered the most irrelevant and pathetic house in the books but people are like "I don't care, I like what it stands for and think it sounds like fun". It's similar to people typing into Slytherin, which everyone thinks is just evil and bullies or something even though according to lore it's not (although most bullies get put into Slytherin or Gryffindor, and Gryffindor is depicted through rose-tinted glasses in the books even with actual depictions of all the things they did ). Gryffindor and Slytherin legitimately both come off rather Dark Triad-ish to me, Gryffindor like more of a psychopathic impulsive "let's have fun, screw everyone else" and Slytherin like Machiavellian businesslords and politicians. Then Ravenclaw is schizoidly withdrawn and just doesn't care about anyone while they're in their heads with their knowledge, and all of the actually "warm" people are grouped together in Hufflepuff. JK Rowling picked a rather weird way to divide people up, even if they are wizards...
Also, can I get sorted into Durmstrang and Beaux Batons instead of the Hogwarts-pastiche cultural appropriation houses already? That would be cool, since those were actually in the books when I read them, and I get tired of Anglophone everything. But no, I'm supposed to relate more to cultural appropriation than Germans or French because JK Rowling is a Brit and they're generally paranoid about Continental Europeans or something in ways Americans aren't...
Ravenclaw. I have some definite "let's go jump into the freezing cold water and give ourselves hypothermia!" daredevil Gryffindor tendencies too, occasional flashes of ruthless Slytherin and I like their imagery best. Plus I'm the kind of kid who would hang out in DATDA and Potions, just because those seem like they'd interest me the most. But ultimately, yeah, I'm a scholarly dork type.
I get Horned Serpent or Thunderbird depending on my mood, Horned Serpent slightly more often. Ilvermorny needs way more definition though, that's literally just "durp scholars or adventurers."
So much Ravenclaw here. I'll open a thread for you bookworms. Our Slytherin one is underpopulated and we're - unsurprisingly - busy elsewhere
I'm a Ravenpuff, LOL!
Really, both describe me equally. I would prefer to be Ravenclaw though, just because Hufflepuff seems to get unappreciated alot and who wants to be the house typically associated as the 'weakest link'?
I really like the qualities that Hufflepuff stands for but I also dislike how its seen as the house that just takes whoever doesn't fit into the other three. Hufflepuff should be special in its own right.
In the Ilvermorny system, I tested as a Wampus! I have no idea how that happened, I'm not a warrior type. I'm much more like a Horned Serpent.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Just took this test, and I got...
So, you're 29% Ravenclaw, 29% Gryffindor, 24% Hufflepuff, and 18% Slytherin! You seem to be an almost perfect combination of all four houses, which is incredibly rare – you’re equal in your intelligence, bravery, loyalty, and ambition. As we know, though, the Sorting Hat takes your preference into account...so it looks like you get to choose your own house. Congratulations!
I am basically a mix of Ravenclaw and Gryffindor.
Balanced houses, hm...
Slytherin bad boys? You'll find them in Gryff. Slytherin is far too secretive to give it all away at first glance. Unless you consider Malfoy who was deliberately utilized by Rowling to make the house an antagonist, much like the other convenient snake villains. Not saying we aren't kinda sly, that's a bit of a given if you understand the nature of ambition and why the house was founded. It's just not as clear-cut in Slytherin that harbors many shy and vulnerable people which is underestimated.
Took the Pottermore test again yesterday.
This settles it. Gryffindor it is!
This article is also helpful:
(...) The Sorting Hat in Real Life theorizes that the house you're sorted into isn't about your personality at all; rather, it's about the traits you value most and what you could be. If you wish to be brave above all else, you're meant for Gryffindor—and hopefully, by being surrounded by students who want to embody the same characteristic, you'll become brave as you grow. If intellectual pursuits are what you find most important in life, it doesn't matter if you're a potions wiz or a transfiguration genius, you'll be placed with the group who shares your love of learning.
(...)
If this is the case, the houses in the wizarding world can have a much stronger effect on who their members become because they're actively shaping them rather than just encouraging the characteristics they already have. The system helps the students become what each believes is the most valuable—and makes the story even richer.
So maybe it's time to reevaluate how you identify: If you're super ambitious but prize loyal and kind friendships above all else, maybe it's time to cross over from Slytherin to Hufflepuff.
First time I tried it a few years ago, I recall I got Gry. Then last year I got Huffle. This time it is Raven. Hm.
My vote is on either Huffle or Raven, not sure which one.
You certainly have a lot of Ravenclaw qualities (like I do).
The question is, which House values and vibe do you relate to better?
Which characters do you relate to better?
Which House would you rather be in?
I get the impression you might feel more comfortable in Hufflepuff.
But the choice lies within you.