Results 1 to 40 of 55

Thread: Magnus Carlsen

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,950
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kiana View Post
    Contrast Magnus with LSI Bobby Fischer who talks of reading about the bad stuff that’s reported about him and he has “cool anger” as in determination to do better. He likes having attention whether they’re haters or lovers. His Se is very, very good but it’s used in Beta terms. He knows the hierarchies inside and out and makes straight deductions as to what to do/how to proceed. His play style is very aggressive.

    I think bobby fischer is an ILI with a dominant subtype, so żour dual. chess seems to be more about functional accentuations. Te and Ti are very important, but there are quite a lot of ethical types with an >2000 Elo, too. even EJ temperaments.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Byn-cinHfPQ

    I think it's a game that's very attractive for normalising subtypes. when I spend more time really analysing carlsen, I noticed that he's not as abstract and quiet as I initially thought.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVS-NIkkUrA
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  2. #2
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I think bobby fischer is an ILI with a dominant subtype, so żour dual. chess seems to be more about functional accentuations. Te and Ti are very important, but there are quite a lot of ethical types with an >2000 Elo, too. even EJ temperaments.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Byn-cinHfPQ

    I think it's a game that's very attractive for normalising subtypes. when I spend more time really analysing carlsen, I noticed that he's not as abstract and quiet as I initially thought.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVS-NIkkUrA
    LOL oh no my dual is probably the most famous chess player in western history. Somehow... that option doesn’t surprise me. I am able to briefly analyze chess moves (I’m not good, just know some plays mechanics) but it’s from straight deductions. I don’t know about Magnus but I find him totally boring and dry and don’t care for his play style at all. I don’t understand why he would choose a move over another but Fischer, I can understand. I can understand the history of chess moves from various players but I just don’t get Magnus. He could be normalizing subtype or any subtype for all I care, all I know is his logic is what I can’t figure out.

    My question is, who would win if there’s a match of Magnus vs Fischer?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •