I thought this was true as well since LIIs value Si and unvalue Te and Se; however, I read quite a bit contradicting this idea. I've skimmed through the articles on wikisocion to see if the claim is true or not. I decided to find out if LIIs are workaholics or not. In the process, I found evidence contradicting the predicate that "LII's hate the necessity of work".
Claim: LIIs are workaholics.
Filatova writes
His work and research often constitute the main purpose of his life. Many representatives of this type corresponds to the label "workaholic"..He cannot simply idle around and exist without a goal.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ion-(Filatova)
Gulenko writesIn business and work activities, this desire for freedom is coupled with a sense of responsibility for him. Undemanding, often indifferent to food and decorations. Being captivated by his work may refuse dinner.
http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=LII_Profile_by_Gulenko
Beskova writeshttp://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...Robespierre.29Male LIIs, especially in mature age, may wish to have a large family and many children. They love their children and are sincerely attached to them, however, they may also be somewhat neglectful if they are seriously taken in by their favorite work.
Bukalov and Boiko writeGeneral characteristic of people of this type - to go to the goal of consistently and systematically, despite the impediments.
http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Socionics_Type_Descriptions_by_Buk alov_and_Boiko#LII_.28Robespierre.29
Wikisocion LII composite under "Common social roles"http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t..._LII_composite
- The self-sacrificing workaholic who works hard, not in order to earn money, but because he doesn't want to give anything less than 100%.
T. Prokofieva and M. Kuzmina writehttp://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...and_M._KuzminaHaving set a goal, the LII relies on his or her own diligence and inner organization to do their work. Consistency, reliability, ability to stick to their word – all of these are typical of representatives of this type.
Evidence against claim. Weisband and Aushra writehttp://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...Robespierre.29His dual The Bonvivant, as if being aware of that, involves him into work not by direct orders but begins to fuss about, to make a lot of unnecessary movements – then The Analyst gets involved, and the work goes rapidly, logically and soundly. He himself does not show much initiative, is reclusive and silent.
I wasn't able to find more, though it could have been the case that my skimming missed some things. So, I went through each profile using control+F to check key words: "lazy", "hard", "necessity", "salary", "profit". I already went through with control+F to find use of the word "work".
I actually found these quotes: Filatova writesBeskova writesThough he is often hardworking, operative, and likes organization, he will not execute the commands of superiors, which in his view are incorrect, or do so very begrudgingly.At home the male LII behaves softly, somewhat passively, and is responsive to requests of his family members. He is not lazy and strives to carry out his obligations. The male LII will not refuse to look after children, to change diapers, to walk to the store and buy produce.
Blohin writeshttp://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...Robespierre.29Methodicalness, perseverance, high capacity for work especially mental, endurance, commitment, responsibility, work without rest or interruption
Conclusion: I know not all these quotes precisely support the claim that LIIs are workaholics, but the picture is clear - they are persistent, hardworking individuals. ADDITION: The quotes talking about how LIIs strive to achieve a goal and are willing to put aside personal pleasures for that goal indicate that LIIs value the process of work when it is of interest to them. We conclude that since they are taking the goal on their own volition without external forces, meaning that they want to do it. I don't think it's possible to value the process of work without valuing its necessity.
Valuing the process of work (on an individual level) = valuing that in order to achieve something, a process must be undertaken to achieve it.
Valuing the necessity of work (on an individual level) = valuing that in order for anything to be accomplished, work must be done.
The process that must be undertaken is the work. Therefore, valuing the process of work <=> valuing the necessity of work. QED for my bullshit pedantic-ass proof.