Quote Originally Posted by FarDraft View Post
I don't know if I agree with this assumption despite its commonality in MBTI forums (haven't seen it used in socionics forums as much). I also don't see the necessity for it, unless, of course, it's a logical consequence rather than an assumption. But I don't know what axioms are present in socionics to allow for such a conclusion - I am generally unaware of socionics' epistemology. Anyways, I have to think more about it before concluding anyways. But that's besides the purpose of the thread.



Do you mean INTj (LII), or are we talking about MBTI (many INTPs type as LII, though it shouldn't be used as a translation)? You use ISFP later, which I assume is ISFp since you typed yourself SEI before. It's good you've managed to discern differences between what your nature is and what you need at a particular moment in time. Good for introspection and understanding yourself.
I'm going with LII because I dislike excessive Se in self or others but can enjoy excessive Si.