Results 1 to 38 of 38

Thread: SRSI's view on Socionics and MBTI (in Russian)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    mclane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Petter View Post
    It depends on what we mean by MBTI. The type indicator or the functions? The descriptions of the functions or the order of the functions?
    The only thing that is not completely flawed are the descriptions of the functions.

  2. #2
    Petter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    1,714
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mclane View Post
    The only thing that is not completely flawed are the descriptions of the functions.
    SRSI:

    "Correspondence of information aspects with Jung’s functions has been proved experimentally in observations of many years. That is Jung’s colossal practice and the great work by Aushra Augustinavichuite, by her students and stalwarts. We come across the first semantic tables in Medvedev’s, Vaisband’s (Onufrienko’s) works. Such research are going on till present time, articles on this theme are published from time to time. Big work on a vocabulary compiling is done by V.D. Ermak in Kiev. Many other socionics suggest their own semantic tables."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •