Observant = Ignoring. I find the former term more accurate.
Interesting. I guess I never perceived the ignoring as observant. How can it be observant when its ignoring?
Originally Posted by mclane
May I ask, have you ever considered a LII typing for youself (for example LII-Ne-- which would be similar in many aspects to EII)?. I think the analysis would make more sense in that case.
That was my former self-typing. Who knows, I may go back to it again. The EII-LII line for me has always been rather blurred.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP