Results 1 to 39 of 39

Thread: + and - interpretation of functions

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Melodies from Mars~
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,016
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Only Si- makes sense to me, by a whole lot.

    For the SSS descriptions, Ne+ is what i value most in myself. I just wish there were a single definition for each +\- functions without any inconsistencies... I really don't feel comfortable using them to type myself for this reason.


  2. #2
    Petter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    1,718
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chryssie View Post
    Only Si- makes sense to me, by a whole lot.

    For the SSS descriptions, Ne+ is what i value most in myself. I just wish there were a single definition for each +\- functions without any inconsistencies... I really don't feel comfortable using them to type myself for this reason.
    Well, we have Yermak's definitions of plus and minus. I think those are accurate. But we don't have perfect descriptions of plus and minus functions. This is because we don't agree on the definitions/descriptions of the functions or information aspects. Jung, mainstream Socionics, SSS, Berens/Nardi, and I use my own definitions of the functions... There are many different views.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •