The energy model. (Model G)

[Soupman]

The trouble with socionics is its strict pseudo-science foundation - endless claims being made without a paradigm for verification and falsification.

[Tigerfadder]

The trouble with socionics is its strict pseudo-science foundation - endless claims being made without a paradigm for verification and falsification.

No it is just him, it is a matter of intellect, he knows how to dream like many of us but simply isn't smart enough to construct the bridge

You seem awful bitter today. Well I am not going to defend any theory, and I believe the thing about LII does usually not base their theories on real world practicality is just, part of the theory in a way.

[Soupman]

You seem awful bitter today. Well I am not going to defend any theory, and I believe the thing about LII does usually not base their theories on real world practicality is just, part of the theory in a way.

I'm just venting my frustration with socionics and the pain I'm hiding underneath - it hurts me that it is seen as rubbish yet I feel it has so much potential to be a corner-stone of society. Negative energy personally can motivate me passionately either into action or to bitterly accept my reality and inadequacy

[Tigerfadder]

I'm just venting my frustration with socionics and the pain I'm hiding underneath - it hurts me that it is seen as rubbish yet I feel it has so much potential to be a corner-stone of society. Negative energy personally can motivate me passionately either into action or to bitterly accept my reality and inadequacy

I wonder if, and if was common knowledge how to identify all the relations, we could make directions for them. For example, when a supervisor you must not give direct orders to your supervisee. If you are mentally ill, you are advised to connect with your dual. When a country divide what path to take, what rules to make, it should consider the spirit of all the Quadra. It could be 4 parties in a country which each contains the values of one Quadra.

[Tigerfadder]

The trouble with socionics is its strict pseudo-science foundation - endless claims being made without a paradigm for verification and falsification.

I recently heard that what differ pseudo-science from science is that it can be observed with at least one of the senses. We can view a star and than calculate with estimations and equations and learn a great deal about the object. If VI was accepted than I see no reason why Socionics would not be just science?

[Soupman]

I recently heard that what differ pseudo-science from science is that it can be observed with at least one of the senses. We can view a star and than calculate with estimations and equations and learn a great deal about the object. If VI was accepted than I see no reason why Socionics would not be just science?

have you looked at epistemology and critical thinking paradigms? these are what"s used to demonstrate the shakey foundations of socionics

[Tigerfadder]

have you looked at epistemology and critical thinking paradigms? these are what"s used to demonstrate the shakey foundations of socionics

I guess, if we want to call it science. Yet, technological and scientific methods could be used to explore socionics futhermore.