Last edited by Arcadea; 09-01-2016 at 04:24 PM.
it's good to keep typing data for a week, at least
Last edited by Sol; 08-18-2016 at 12:54 PM.
Not SLE, seems introverted´?
Yeah I sent him the video in a pm and he responded. I doubt SLE, I just, and have never, thought I was extraverted but it's one of the answers I got from a while back which I started to buy a little bit. I've also gotten IEI from a select few, but almost all responses were in the Beta quadra. I've had an account on here that I seemed to have lost access to, as well as reddit, and that's where I was getting the Beta responses from if you were wondering.
LSI: bunch of Ti which is rooted in sensing world and very good handle on Si. Nope for SLE.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
here's what I'm 100% sure of. That you are a T type
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You give me the impression of being LSI
Posted another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f55j...ature=youtu.be
This time answering questions, let me know what you think.
@Maritsa @Andreas
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I see lots and lots of Se, and I agree that you are a thinking type.
I think SLE-Ti is very likely, but I also see lesser amounts of LIE (from the way you speak rationally) and SEE (from the way you briefly exert force), and sometimes even some ILI (from a hint of introversion). But there is so much Se, moderated by some thinking, that I'm leaning toward SLE.
I've typed you LSI before, if I'm not mistaken. You seem Ti dominant.
you are subscribed to ethan and hila
It's about even. I'm looking at the wikisocion page and I relate to these things:
EP
- flexible
- optimistic & open-minded
- entertains people easily & naturally (it's only those who I feel comfortable with, even with people I'm not truly 'friends' with I can be very sociable and wanting to dive deeper. for instance, my boss is very open-minded about exploring topics and I love talking to him about the human mind, existence, how concepts relate to eachother and how everything that we say or do is coming from some place, but ultimately everything is truly what your mind makes it out to be. i guess how interdependent your state of mind is and how it reflects the environment around you)
IJ
- calm, balanced & inert
- usually very stable mood (unless I'm passionate about something, then the emotions can start flowing)
- more reactive than active
Lol what is that logic? I mean, it comes easily when I'm with friends because I know how to make them laugh but if it's people who I'm not really close to then I'm more self-contained, but trying to throw witty remarks or jokes in when I feel it's necessary and could pull it off. It's been so long and I still haven't come to a conclusion about my type...
This assumption could work if it was an introverted subtype or a person with real anxiaty issues which is not type related. An LSI-Se at work is very entertaining, he just needs to be comfortable to play the fool aka be around people he knows. This specific person was very quiet during at least 2 months and then there was an more relaxing event where he just literally changed his behaviour. He stayed like that since then.
If not logic, it is experience. I have known many LSIs and LIIs and none of them entertain people. Just look at their duals the EIE and the ESE. Both stage people and entertainers. this is not without reason. Since LII and LSI are unable to make comfortable emotional atmosphere around themselves, their duals take this task. This however does not come from being an intratim, you can find ESIs of both subtypes, entertaining their friends, but it comes from their Ti program mode. and the creative function can be Se or Ne for example an LII can suggest to close friends an activity he sees as interesting but can not "entertain them easily" in a sense an EIE or an ESE could.
My LII best friend for example, when we are alone can make witty remarks and good jokes but with "people" she shuts off and stays quiet. She can not entertain a group, she can entertain only one person.
Perhaps he has met a dual which gives him the confidence to act such a way. Since when one meets a dual and starts conversations with them or even watches them, their behavior becomes similar to their dual. For example as an LIE when I am with an ESI for a while, my behavior changes for better and my hurried mode becomes calm and caring. Perhaps the LSI has gotten inspiration from an EIE at that certain event and is getting inspired afterwards also.
Wut? I definitely know LSI's and even LII's who entertain people when they feel comfortable/are in good mood. Some LSI's can also be very charming - true, others are the boringest people you're ever going to meet beside SLI's. Many have great snarky sense of humour - it's not like everybody is 100% introverted. It's just a different kind of charm than ESE's/EIE's.
Nah I mean I'll go as far as to dance if I'm with people I'm comfortable with, even if it's just being flat out ridiculous. I guess I need to be certain that I'm in a 'judgment-free' zone to get that out of the box. Other than that I'm just fairly quiet, probably as much as in my video.
LSI seems like a good fit but I don't necessarily agree with the temperament, even being a J-dom. Maaaybe SLE-Ti
Just because Ij sounds so rigid and stuck in their own rules whereas I really have no preconceived checklist going into anything and just let things flow.
I'm trying to focus on typing other people (celebrities) as well as just get a feel of how the information elements play out in someone's psyche so I can watch from outside of myself sometime to get a good opinion.
Oh definitely, I've always been very passive with pretty much everything. Even if one of my friends got worked up about something I would try to calm them down, but they would get mad and say "oh you just don't care". In reality, they forget what happened a day later.
I don't really know. I guess planning, but not planning. If I don't see it in my head first then it probably won't happen.
If you're in fact e5, then you're INTx and certainly not a sensor.
Typing of people in normal IRL interview also gives low typing matches (CRT experiment of 1999 year - 17% match). With celebrities it's just more evident, while information to type them correctly is enough. All today typing is "lol" with average match <20%. Especially it's "lol" when baseless bs like Reinin's dichotomies is used.
If those people are friends or similar - nothing special.