This model is mainly based on my personal observations, but also on research made by various socionists. Yes, ILI's Fe+ is a 4D function. However, it is the most unconscious secondary function. Also, we cannot look at Fe+ in isolation. It is actually the exchange of information (aspects) between Ni and Fe that causes +/-. I agree with Tsypin regarding this.
Yes, IEI's NiTe are strong functions. But it is ILI's Te- that you sometimes see in IEI, not LIE's Te-. Model D uses accepting/producing functions.In the same manner, IEI's strongest functions would have Te- (business logic of risk and entrepreneurship... which supervisor LIE shares), but weakest functions would have Te+ (logic of use and rational management of resources.... which conflictor LSE shares). In what sense it is strongest / weakest?
'Strongest' corresponds to 4-dimensional, 'weakest' corresponds to 1-dimensional.
This is about dimensionality.Ability / Inability to hold a lot of information for a long time
This is not necessarily related to dimensionality.or competency / incompetency in its usage when it is required in the environment?
First of all, ILI's Fe- is actually semi-conscious. Model D is in a sense two Model As. Fe- "pushes" Fi- to unconsciousness, and Fi+ "pushes" Fe+ to unconsciousness.How the conscious / unconscious functions are determined here? That is, what makes Fe+ unconscious, but Fe- conscious in an ILI?
Read about Model B here (I use Bing machine translation):What are Bukalov's "Shadow functions"?
http://socionic.info/pdf/as498.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...TIM_and_Socion
Yes, my subtype system contradicts the inert/contact subtype system. But I don't think the inert/contact subtype system is accurate.You said (if I understand correctly) when one strong function is strengthened then every strong functions are strengthened (thus NiTiNeFe would be strengthened), this contradicts the inert/contact subtype system where strengthening of Ni (in an ILI) would lead to the strengthening of NiFiNeFe (notice the Ti vs Fi difference). How do you explain that?
The first number refers to strong/weak. ILI-1,? has very strong strong functions, but very weak weak functions :-)I am lost to understand (and couldn't follow) how you notated the subtypes (e.g., LII-2,7), can you elaborate?
The second number refers to extroversion/introversion, and consequently how much someone uses the secondary functions. ILI-?,10 is an ambivert. And ILI-?,1 is very introverted. LIE-?,1 is very extroverted.