You should rule out intj because the pedantic, parents child way in which LSE treat their mate like a infantile seeking a guide would drive you insane.Originally Posted by msnobody
I am the only person in the entire socion equipped with the love and patience to deal with LSE.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
i like when men act as like a teacher for me and teaches me information
How patient are you? If you see something is blue and the other person insists that it is red when you are out to prove it's blue how patient can you be in putting something away until the other person sees what you see?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
i dont know? a really odd example lol
A small remark. I have 5 opinions about your type from other people by your videos. (there are no public links to clips)
They have said their opinion independantly, without knowing opinions of others beforehand.
Aaron and 4 other, mostly not the worst typers. All(!) their versions were types with leading S.
those people actually did knew others opinions beforehad watching my 1!!!! video ^^, some of them type me ESI which you said is impossible for me. So where exactly does this support your opinion? nowhere. and yeah theres just no way im S leading. ^^ hence i prefer S types for my partners and am very bad at sensing to the point where it leads to embarrassment. I relate very much to 1D Se. Which correlates to INFx whcih i already typed myself as.
Can you stop typing in my thread now? you give no good information and you contradict yourself constantly. its very obvious why people dont like you here.
Last edited by maniac; 07-02-2016 at 01:01 PM.
You was said to sort them by psychological comfort and hence sorted by personal liking as main factor. While I say here about personal interest what is other situation. If you indeed made previously the choice by personal interest mainly instead what was said, then that your data is irrelevant - for both situations.
If you want to check is your type E or I - follow the method I've described earlier. And when you'll want to decide about which types have better IR with you to suggest about your type, then follow psychological comfort factor. That's it.
Personal interest and psychological comfort ties in together, lol. Stop posting in my threads now or i will message an admin to get you banned from it.
Posting Permissions
