SEE/ESFp and ILI/INTp Duality? (Aggressor-Victim)

[Chae]

I think it is valued to mention that ILI do a lot of Ti stuff which help the SEE to deal with that area of their life which they mostly avoided and covered up. Same would be for SEE Fe.

Yes, that's why subtypes are important. ILI-Te needs more help with Fe, that's why SEE-Fi is their preferred match as ethical functions are emphasized and vice versa, same goes for Ni and Se subtypes. SEE-Fi, for instance, can get almost ESI-ish in my ILI-Ni presence, and our thinking functions don't balance the interaction. SEE-Se, however, is just...

[Beautiful sky]

Yes, that's why subtypes are important. ILI-Te needs more help with Fe, that's why SEE-Fi is their preferred match as ethical functions are emphasized and vice versa, same goes for Ni and Se subtypes. SEE-Fi, for instance, can get almost ESI-ish in my ILI-Ni presence, and our thinking functions don't balance the interaction. SEE-Se, however, is just...

So LSE si needs and EII Ne? hum. I do well with the Te subtypes that are more decisive about their physical sensations and know what to eat, what's healthy without being too much like babies about it.

[Chae]

So LSE si needs and EII Ne? hum. I do well with the Te subtypes that are more decisive about their physical sensations and know what to eat, what's healthy without being too much like babies about it.

Indeed. Yet, the infantile share of this relation is an EII's. When LSE-Te can provide everything that your Te suggestive needs (subconsciously), superb

Ne as a function isn't the most extraverted anyway, that would be Se territory because of the tangible properties and forces it deals with. In short: Ne-Te works well. Se-Ni, however, is a more extreme combination among subtype pairing. SLE-Se/IEI-Ni duality has the greatest discrepancy in respective externality/internality.
To me, Aggressor-Victim relations depend on energy exchange more than Infantile-Caregiver duals.