Results 1 to 40 of 251

Thread: SEE/ESFp and ILI/INTp Duality? (Aggressor-Victim)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Later, Trolls Gypsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    The Shadows
    TIM
    EIE 2w3 So/Sx
    Posts
    109
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by inumbra View Post
    i think the ILI builds barriers more out of fear... not out of an attempt to toy with someone. once someone is too close it causes fear and the retreat back into one's inner world for safety out of fear of not being able to handle it or fear of invasion... the particular fears may depend on the person.

    i thought beta was more the quadra that wants to set up the deliberate gauntlet test or whatever: prove you can break through my barriers to show you are worthy.

    (and of course, some people do deliberately toy with others, regardless of quadra)
    Yeah, I think that Se and Ti are the real "aggressors" and Ni and Fe the real "Victims."

    Regardless, I don't know how well I could deal with someone suddenly turning the cold shoulder to me no matter the reason.
    Sociotype: EIE
    Psyche Yoga: VEFL
    ~~
    Goddess Archetype: Artemis
    Zodiac: Taurus()
    Scorpio() Capricorn (☾)
    Slytherin/Horned Serpent
    Chaotic Good

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SheWolf View Post
    Yeah, I think that Se and Ti are the real "aggressors" and Ni and Fe the real "Victims."

    Regardless, I don't know how well I could deal with someone suddenly turning the cold shoulder to me no matter the reason.
    I just don't think that ILI do that. They like diplomacy and political approach
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •