One conversation has composed of:
LSE-Te: *Shares some logically bizarre humor about the events of the day, giving warm eyes and subtle laughing)* (due to
egos' tendency to want to share quaint or peculiar bits of information.)
EII-Ne: *Can't stop laughing/smiling at the LSE and asking questions*
EII-Ne: *Eludes to some eccentric Ne pursuits for the day*
LSE-Te: *Returns exceptional logical feedback and information, and ideas they should try*
LSE-Te: *Mentions some serious conflicts and dislikes they have about someone*
EII-Ne: *Asks questions regarding the situation to help figure out the problem, tries to remain positive and neutral, solidifying a feeling of ease in the LSE*
EII-Ne: *Shares how much they like *insert* these sorts of things and overall tastes*
LSE-Te: *Puts them into a certain psychological frame of reference and shares some of the LSE's recommendations, often very fitting*
EII-LSE: Compared to the irrational members, there is a stable frame of mind and strategy built between the two.
Between opposite subtypes, there is sometimes a certain criticism of the other's subtype function. ie. LSE-Te has a strong degree of self-confidence in
intellectual matters (especially I'm regarding Jungian
), but the
matters of the EII-Ne are somewhat internally criticized by the LSE-Te, even when the EII displays intellectual confidence. Likewise, the
matters of the LSE-Te are criticized by the EII-Ne who has a strong degree of self-confidence in
, even when the LSE-Te is very accurate in their intuitions.
I have not experienced this phenomenon with equal subtypes. Much less small criticisms, and interchange is more gratifying in equal subtypes. Self-confidence is highly welcomed by each other in their subtype function. (I'm a sucker for
-creative.) An EII-Ne and LSE-Si love to come to more of a consensus about
and
matters with less self-confidence. An LSE-Te and EII-Fi love to come to more of a consensus about
and
matters with less self-confidence.