Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: Cognitive Type Theory

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,339
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Okay. I think it would help that you be more yourself and talk about areas instances where you use Ni

    You will wait and see what will come of it over time too?

    The story about the SEE stealing someone I liked is a case I thought where I can practice my Ni to see and envision an outcome of that relationship and all I see is Ne. Many possible outcomes. :/ I guess each possibility can have Ni but I cant see one inevitable event.


    "Ni observes and synthesizes developments as building blocks leading to something interesting that could happen, tries to envision how and when it could happen. Ni is about development between patterns of events over time. Ni thinks "learning a language is good to reach because of the places it will bring you to." About the outcome, Ni says "that was bound to develop in that success/failure." Ni will absorb information to add them as building blocks to come to some "essence" of the ideas they're developing. Ni takes a bunch of different instances and synthesizes them together to develop them in one direction of potential development."
    I am fine with whatever he decides because I think he has a vision of where he would like things to go with his theory/system. I am not part of his team so have no investment in it personally but I am very interested. He has completely different terms than, IEI, EII, ESI, etc... I do not want to push any socionics concepts on him because he will draw to himself the information that is useful for him. I believe strongly that things will only happen in perfect time, even if it does not always seem like the timing is perfect. You can't rush progress but I think things are unfolding as expected. In this case I will take a wait and see approach too because I do not want to inadvertently influence him in a way that sets him off course. As, he said, I do not fit neatly into just one type in his system, yet. I trust that he can do this and we have been exchanging information.

    Have you looked at his website yet? http://cognitivetype.com/theory/

    I am synthesizing as we "speak".

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I am fine with whatever he decides because I think he has a vision of where he would like things to go with his theory/system. I am not part of his team so have no investment in it personally but I am very interested. He has completely different terms than, IEI, EII, ESI, etc... I do not want to push any socionics concepts on him because he will draw to himself the information that is useful for him. I believe strongly that things will only happen in perfect time, even if it does not always seem like the timing is perfect. You can't rush progress but I think things are unfolding as expected. In this case I will take a wait and see approach too because I do not want to inadvertently influence him in a way that sets him off course. As, he said, I do not fit neatly into just one type in his system, yet. I trust that he can do this and we have been exchanging information.

    Have you looked at his website yet? http://cognitivetype.com/theory/

    I am synthesizing as we "speak".
    I will look at it my dear "Prophet"
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,339
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    I will look at it my dear "Prophet"
    Sometimes I just want to squeeze you.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •