Socionics is impressive with compartmentalizing information accumulated from observation and research in psychology, in general. But Socionics does have a distinct and even inevitable flaw that every system will always have, and that's trying to mesh everything together perfectly into this little box. That's why there are some things from little bits of words to sentences to even paragraphs in each description that one will not relate with, despite the perceived accuracy that person will connect with. Myself included. Socionics does try to maintain consistency by not cramming all the information in places it shouldn't belong, but the fact of the matter is there's more to a person than the typology and other systems that connect like enneagrams, DCNH, astrology, MBTI, etc. Those contributing factors are upbringing, health, and personal idiosyncrasies and experiences. Nobody will wholeheartedly relate with every single word from that description they relate most with. There is always more to an individual.