if so, how many ng/dL do you have?
Have you gotten your testosterone level checked?
if so, how many ng/dL do you have?
Got checked from when before I can remember. Couldn't tell you.
Probably quite low.
I think mine is quite high for a female
low t reporting in
How low? Did you actually get tested? It can be hard to know without a test.Originally Posted by Bertrand
I have no idea what my testosterone is, honestly.
Yes, I got it checked 3 months ago. 1146 ng/dl, whatever that means. (I am 24 years old.)
You're slightly above average. Good job.Do you exercise or do anything for it?
(Random unauthoritative source for the grading of T-levels: http://elitemensguide.com/testosterone-levels-by-age/)
Because I don't own a car, I end up walking or biking a great deal of the time.You're slightly above average. Good job.
However, I would hardly call myself an exercise freak.
I can tell by the size of my tiny balls they must not be putting out much
unlike adam "big balls" strange and "the sex beast" cuvinene
This has got to be the most random quote that I have seen on here for a while.
Nobody on here cares about your testicular volume, dude. Perhaps you are gay.
I only know the quick (semi-effective) digit test to compare index and ring finger ratio from my psychology teacher, according to that I'm balanced, low T. People with testosterone levels that are too high likely have a longer ring finger than index, as weird as it sounds. You can also predict sexual behaviour and several illness risks from that.
Based on that test, I'm gay.
My index finger is a bit more than a fingernail's length shorter than my ring finger. But it is my understanding that this is actually an indication of testosterone levels in the womb, and depends on the ability of the woman to produce testosterone. With every boy baby, she gets better at producing it, so the youngest in a line of boys might be more likely to have high testosterone distortions. So I have read.
Incidentally, this is one of the things that I look at when dating a woman. My fairly masculine (compared to other women - she looked very female, but in a cold and imperious way) SLI ex had ring and index fingers of equal length. I think I've seen about two women whose index fingers were longer than their ring fingers, and both seemed like very soft girly-girls.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 11-14-2017 at 01:57 PM.
I'm driving myself nuts trying to figure out which of mine is longer. I think they're close enough to say about the same.
Mine was above linearity and needed to be diluted.
Jk..... normal
The top of my index fingers stop at about the bottom of my ring fingernails, so I took a testosterone bath inside mother.
according to this image, my equal fingers are normal.
so this is why I have breasts
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Same. Which I guess isn't saying anything heh since most people's will be average/normal, but I felt like responding anyway.
No need.
Same.
is this the new locker room question?
according to this image, my equal fingers are normal.
Thanks, you just predicted my potential cause of death.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyng...ting-the-data/
There are morphological differences between men and women — you may have noticed — and since they’re driven to a large extent by systemic differences in hormones that regulate growth and metabolism, it’s not surprising at all that there are subtle variations in details. The question is whether they are at all significant functionally or selectively, and there’s no evidence for that at all in these ridiculous digit length studies.Digit ratio stuff is bullshit.There is a statistical bias in the distribution, but really, if I told you the lengths of my fingers, you would not be able to use that to make significant estimates of my testosterone levels…and these differences are tiny relative to age-related changes anyway. We do not turn into women in our old age, though.
This will be the new way to VI and type people.according to this image, my equal fingers are normal
my estrogen levels are through the roof please pm me for more details i'm available 24/7
I've read that intermittent fasting improves T levels.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
My index finger is about 94-95% of my ring finger,
But something else is 500% of my ring finger
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Post the pics u cunt
@Olimpia
Hm?
Yeah, based on my finger ratios I'd have to be a transwoman.
(I once read that one of the ways to tell whether someone is a transwoman is by looking at their hands... haha.)
And according to the pic above...
I should be: Masculine (nope), Homosexual (eh... I am heteroflexible), Autistic (haha), Left handed (nope), Physical abilities (
haha... seriously tho, they are fine, but not outstanding).
My SEE sis has "bigger balls" than I do, and her hands are like in the middle.
Sociotype seems to matter more.
Testical size is indicative of the males in your family and their past history of success with women. The smaller the balls, the more success your line has had.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
My hands are exactly like the "very feminine" ones but my testosterone levels are highaccording to this image, my equal fingers are normal.
You got them tested?My hands are exactly like the "very feminine" ones but my testosterone levels are high
Yep. Blood test. It's not insanely high, just a bit high for a female.. So this digit ratio stuff is BS
I think I'm high testosterone, because for an IEI Im kind of a dickhead and I really enjoy beating people up.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
But, I'm also a guy AND an IEI, so maybe I have no testosterone at all.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
High testosterone. That's why I'm horny
Well, digit ratio is relatively easy test. When it comes to large samples it should be significant. Under extreme conditions like trading differences might pop out even more.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
