I really have to give you a hand here. That's the biggest misidentification of theory for reality. You don't care for evidence that is real, you want reliability of your models, you place your faith in models to explain reality instead of facts.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
Really???? OMFG!!!!! how could have I been so blind!!! Yes, the descriptions! Of course! And all this time I thought they were suppose to describe ME! IDIOT!! I'm suppose to describe THEM! It all makes sense now!If you read many of them, you'll see that overall they fit you better than the descriptions of INTPs. If you have tested as an INTP that is rather irrelevant. Your MBTI type is defined by how well you fit the type descriptions.
Oh this is gold! PUUURE GOOOOOLD!!!!But still we have your test results on the test in this thread, and that result is really strange. If you know yourself well you should not get that test result -- unless you are an INTp. So, whatever way you put it, you are mistaken about something -- your socionic type, your MBTI type or about your true nature (leading you to answer incorrectly to the test questions).