OK so I've restored the open copy from the secured copy. I have a backup copy in case someone decides to deface the list again.
A suggestion to anyone wanting to make edits to the open sheet. Download a saved version before, during, and after you make any large edits. That way if someone decides to troll you, you won't have lost all of your work.
IEE Ne Creative Type
Some and role lovin too. () I too...
!!!!!!
off-topic moved to: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=36843
please stop telling each other to kill yourselves and stop the unnecessary insults.
Anyways, I've saved the list as of 7:26 AM (in Ohio), August 8, 2011; I'm manually going over the types to standardize their presentation to make it possible for a script to run them easier! If my efforts don't help, then I'll still try to keep grinding on through this monster; don't know if I'll be able to, but I'll be more done than before...
Of course, there will and should be versions of the list past that point in time, so keep on going
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
This is becoming a one big joke, the spreadshit looks like candy plus, haha, what happened to "consensus" ? Sank like the titanic, I guess.
I found this a little interesting in terms of a social experiment, people weren't capable of handling the free and open format, eventually the majority started equilibriating towards a secure and closed format.
OH WELL I GUESS I WAS JUST LYING
YEAH
MAKES SENSE
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You're an anarchist and yet were the first to promote a form of centralized control.
Maybe you should take high school English again.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Jesus you ******s take any chance you get to plug your ridiculous worldview
Go work for a big corporation, you'll fit right in...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Frankly, the only disadvantage of a closed project is that the inviter may not always be around, or people will be too lazy with the process. Neither of those are significant enough compared to the pointlessness of tediously and repeatedly giving input only to have it vandalized so easily, when all that can be prevented by simple exclusion.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Closed with listed entry seems to be fine. The current "open" spreadsheet has nothing but a picture of a tumor with bees on it.
Also, make sure to discontinue editing privileges to people who haven't made a list after a couple days.
I'm temporarily locking the spreadsheet down, you can view but not edit, may only be a temporary measure, but this allows people some time to relax and not work themselves to death reuploading data....
Closed projects take energy by some sort of administrator to keep them alive, the moment the administration quits the thing falls apart. If the administration stays up to take care of basic day to day details it is usually successful.
Open projects don't require energy of some administrator to keep them alive, and thus have an easier time existing in the absence of an explicit administrator. Although they have a large chance of failing due to apathy of the community or exploitation from outside powers.
Apathy of one tortured soul more like it
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
August 8, 2011, 7:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time typing list (raw)
August 8, 2011, 7:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time typing list (standardized)
The raw list is exactly that - a raw list.
The standardized list has all typings in three letter format. The flavor typings have been omitted in that version so that the data could be crunched automatically somehow...
I'm either going to try to shit out some massive amounts of here to get it to work, or I'm just gonna rawdog the whole damn list manually; I know there's an "easier" way to do all of this, and if I can't find it... all I know is that I'm gonna go forward one way or another...
P.S. I used the lists in Ashton's batcave; they've been more stable, so I went with those ones
Last edited by woofwoofl; 08-09-2011 at 03:57 AM. Reason: my brain is running out of mojo
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Maritsa's column is where it's at.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Lol I'm just going to write a vba module to loop through all the columns, paste them into a single column as strings, remove duplicates then move them around intelligently into groups/domains, after which I'll set up a matrix that has one column for a standardized nomenclature, and 16 other columns that gives a certain type a weight 0 to 1 with a sum of 1. So someone using "alpha" will have all alpha types with weight 0.25.
I'll use this table/matrix as an index to lookup wieghtings when doing statistical calculations.
Maybe something like that would work better than a closed spreadsheet?
http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2008/...ets-start.html
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Awesome!
As far as weightings are concerned, I started doing things by going that route, and the open-ended typings wobbled up the results severely once I got to Airborne and Aiss (I didn't exactly make it far )...
There's lots of really loose typings afoot, sometimes to the point of having 12 out of the 16 types chosen as a possibility. Open-ended typings are great to have, and due to their nature, should probably be less of a deciding factor towards the end results. Having 16 of 16 types equally chosen and explicitly stated as such would weight each type with 0.0625 of a vote for every type; having 0 of 16 types equally chosen and explicitly stated as such would weight each type with 0.0000 of a vote for each type. The following should correct all of this:
if:
X = raw typing value
Y = weighted typing value
then:
Y = (16/15)X - 1/15
Gonna make a table to show how this all goes down:
If nothing else, could such a thing be included in addition to the raw data weights and the results brought on by them?
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
That's not what you said the other night.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Awww, esc and ashton