And, again, Jeremy, I realize that this could just be a "mask" I'm wearing. But based on my observations, the type makes the most sense.
And, again, Jeremy, I realize that this could just be a "mask" I'm wearing. But based on my observations, the type makes the most sense.
But wait, I relate to much more than just the Ne-Fi part. What's your point exactly?What's that have to do with anything? Lol. That could be your Suggestive+Demonstrative (Ne-Fi).
I was editing it lol. Ne-Fi is all of that quote you posted. Though it breaks it down into parts, it's still Ne-Fi type description lol
Look, believe whatever you want to believe. I posted the whole Sociotype description and not just Ne-Fi (At least that's how I see it)
Just so happens that I relate to most of it.
All I got to say really.
What's Sociotype.com have to do with Socionics?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Okay Jeremy, I'm getting tired of this.
Sorry, but I'm putting you on my ignore list.
Yeah, good call on that one, Maritsa
Of course, you can never really be certain so I'll keep reading on this. The whole thing is really fascinating
...as long as you don't absolutely convolute it like Jeremy did
*shrug* lol