Why thank you, I love you too. It comes naturally, I don't even have to strain myself.Originally Posted by ananke
Why thank you, I love you too. It comes naturally, I don't even have to strain myself.
I think I love the both of you.
You want a sandwich ?
Nah I'm cool.
I have my doubts that it's an LSE sandwich though.
Ryu's seriousness, inflexibility, and inability to even listen to the protests around him - not to mention his redneck conceptions of gender, reminds me of this Delta ST gym coach I had once, who made me run laps for weeks for not wearing the proper gym shorts (mine were too "gay" and colorful apparently). Maybe they're all LSI, who knows. Either way, these kind of people are my conflictors.
I dont think there is a single well-informed person on this board, aside from those who simply accept his self-typing because its his self-typing and dont pretend to "know better" (ie lazy bitches), who believe UDP to be LSE. Absolute utter rubbish. He is most likely EII, in my opinion, or perhaps LII.Ryu's seriousness, inflexibility, and inability to even listen to the protests around him - not to mention his redneck conceptions of gender, reminds me of this Delta ST gym coach I had once, who made me run laps for weeks for not wearing the proper gym shorts (mine were too "gay" and colorful apparently). Maybe they're all LSI, who knows. Either way, these kind of people are my conflictors.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Well, I think you're thinking about the wrong sandwich.
Well, I can't say I'm not deaf to opposition but it so happens I actually agree with Kassie or other delta NF(s) for the most part.
Right on! I'm bookmarking this
Thanks Kassie.
ananke's contrast between LSE and SLE is good and to the point. Indeed "gambler" doesn't sound like LSE, except he goes headlong into things and takes decisions on the fly (that's some sort of risk-taking). SLEs tend to analyze and plan the tactics ahead in order to strike once, though they are more prone to enter endeavours that are risky in themselves - untested waters, uncertain success, but the promise of a great outcome.
Also, IME while LSEs are the ones who boast having "nothing to hide", SLEs keep their intentions secret, avoiding to spoil the premises they start off. I doubt SLEs can fully trust anyone. Unlike LSEs, who consider agreements to be a given and easily designate people to tasks for the common good, SLEs insure technically they can't be cheated, they tell in your face they need a physical guarantee when it comes to money & stuff. SLE needs control from the start, LSE manages things under way.
Reply With Quote
