Username: Megane
Currently self-type as: LII
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
2
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
2
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
2
4
1
3
2
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
3
3
2
4
4
1
2
4
4
3
1
1
4
1
4
4
3
4
4
3
2
0
0
0
3
3
4
0
1
1
3
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
3
4
4
4
0
3
0
4
4
3
3
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Username: Megane
Currently self-type as: LII
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
2
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
2
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
2
4
1
3
2
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
0
3
3
2
4
4
1
2
4
4
3
1
1
4
1
4
4
3
4
4
3
2
0
0
0
3
3
4
0
1
1
3
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
3
4
4
4
0
3
0
4
4
3
3
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Username: Pookie
Currently self-type as: IEI
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
2
3
2
1
3
3
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
4
3
3
0
3
4
4
3
1
2
2
3
3
2
1
3
1
3
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
4
3
3
2
4
3
1
1
4
3
4
1
2
2
2
3
3
0
1
4
2
4
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
2
2
2
4
3
2
1
4
4
2
3
3
4
1
1
3
3
1
0
0
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Cool! I'll have a go.
Username: Jaein
Currently self-type as: EII
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
3
3
3
0
0
0
3
1
3
1
4
3
1
3
3
1
3
3
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
3
3
1
0
3
1
3
3
1
3
0
0
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
4
4
1
4
3
3
1
3
0
1
3
1
1
3
0
Username: Roro
Currently self-type as: N/A
0
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
4
3
1
3
1
1
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
0
1
0
2
2
3
1
3
3
4
3
2
4
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
1
3
3
1
3
2
1
3
2
3
4
3
3
0
1
0
2
3
1
1
3
0
4
0
2
4
4
3
3
1
4
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
1
2
1
0
0
3
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
Too mean to be IEI, not responsible enough to be EII.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Username: Simo
Currently self-type as: ILI
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
3
3
1
3
4
3
1
4
1
1
1
0
1
4
3
1
3
0
3
2
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
2
0
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
2
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
1
0
3
2
3
1
2
3
1
3
1
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
2
0
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
Would you mind giving a download link to the spreadsheet?
I don't like the idea.Originally Posted by ouronis
PS Now it's linked anyway.
If it's better for you, I can put your terms in glam's copy so that it's 1-to-1
Chips and Underwear
Currently self-type as: LII/EII
0
1
3
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
1
4
3
1
4
4
4
1
3
2
1
3
3
0
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
0
4
3
1
3
1
3
3
1
1
4
3
3
0
1
3
3
3
3
4
4
2
0
1
3
3
4
3
3
3
1
3
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
1
1
2
1
3
3
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
and on that day, she turned into a girl uptight about proper definitions...
*ahem*
mad·cap
ˈmadˌkap/
adjective
adjective: madcap; adjective: mad-cap
1.
amusingly eccentric.
"a surreal, madcap novel"
synonyms: zany, eccentric, unconventional
"a madcap comedy"
done or thought up without considering the consequences; crazy or reckless.
"some madcap money-making scheme"
synonyms: reckless, rash, foolhardy, foolish, harebrained, wild, hasty, imprudent, ill-advised; More
informalcrazy, crackpot, crack-brained
"a madcap scheme"
noun
noun: madcap; plural noun: madcaps; noun: mad-cap; plural noun: mad-caps
1.
an eccentric person.
synonyms: eccentric, crank, madman/madwoman, maniac, lunatic; oddity, character;
informalcrackpot, oddball, weirdo, loony, nut, fruit loop, screwball, loon
"she was a boisterous madcap"
madcap
(ˈmędˌkęp)adj1. impulsive, reckless, or lively
n2. an impulsive, reckless, or lively person
I don't go that far
oh dear, two definitions. well, i was using the one i liked in my post.madcap
(ˈmędˌkęp)adj1. impulsive, reckless, or lively
n2. an impulsive, reckless, or lively person
I don't go that far
(that was meant to be all childish btw. it's my character for this day of forum posting. because i've lost my mind.)
Last edited by marooned; 10-12-2015 at 08:15 PM.
Last edited by Galen; 10-13-2015 at 04:20 AM. Reason: format
Please change the format...
fuck okay changed, hope I didn't accidentally delete anything because I ain't doing this again
at least I was conscientious enough to put it in a spoiler tag unlike *some*
@Galen only reads first post ---> strong p
lol, there's no reason to make people wait - it's not like you created this testI will explain how to calculate results on your own, without the excel chart, just a bit later
here's an English version of the spreadsheet, for anyone interested (uploaded on Dropbox). the translation of some terms are slightly different from Kore's OP. the spreadsheet gives you detailed results for each sociotype, as well as the other graphs. if you already filled this out, you'll just need to copy and paste your answers.
Last edited by glam; 10-12-2015 at 07:57 PM.
I did not say I created it. I wanted to see statistics before people can do on their own; it was sort of experiment. Okay now it failed (not enough data to analyse) so does not make sense to continuelol, there's no reason to make people wait - it's not like you created this test
here's an English version of the spreadsheet, for anyone interested (uploaded on Dropbox). the translation of some terms are slightly different from Kore's OP. the spreadsheet gives you detailed results for each sociotype, as well as the other graphs. if you already filled this out, you'll just need to copy and paste your answers.
okay, but i don't really understand why withholding the original spreadsheet is necessary for you to obtain and analyze the statistics - all you have to do is explain this and ask people for the data. pretty sure most people here would be happy to post their answers for this reason.I did not say I created it. I wanted to see statistics before people can do on their own; it was sort of experiment. Okay now it failed (not enough data to analyse) so does not make sense to continue
Reason N 1: I did not create the test, so I wasn't sure I could share the spreadsheet itself.
Reason N 2, more valid than the first one : I don't know how to do it
I was going to post the manual calculation. But anyways as said, does not make sense anymore.
wow, I filled it in, edited the 2s and got:
ESE 11,64%
ESI 11,7%
GO TO HELL!
And the original version was showing only ESE, by far the only leader.
That's why I wanted to post the calculation later.
I obviously know that now. Hey! At least it is a SF. It could've been far worse like some...SeTi or something.
Am I really so mellow?
Username - Serpent
Self-type - SEE
4
3
4
1
2
4
3
3
3
2
0
2
3
1
1
3
3
1
0
3
1
3
3
1
2
1
3
3
1
2
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
2
3
4
3
2
3
4
2
0
1
3
1
3
3
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
3
3
4
3
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
3
4
3
1
3
3
Can someone calculate this?
You wanna know the best thing? I viewed your results today but didn't copy them. Strange I know. Anyhow, here they are in the text format:
IE:
Si 43%
Te 65%
Fi 33%
Se 73%
Ni 28%
Fe 43%
Ti 50%
Ne 50%
I 50%
J 43%
E 50%
P 57%
Aspects table:
ILE 9,31%
SEI 4,83%
ESE 5,29%
LII 4,64%
EIE 2,87%
LSI 8,23%
SLE 13,5%
IEI 3,12%
SEE 7,24%
ILI 5,94%
LIE 4,39%
ESI 5,35%
LSE 8,1%
EII 3,01%
IEE 4,99%
SLI 9,18%
There you go.
Username: DaftPunk
Selftype: Delta ST
Ni-LIE
3
1
4
1
1
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
1
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
1
1
1
4
1
3
3
1
3
2
3
4
1
3
1
1
1
4
3
2
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
1
1
3
1
3
3
3
1
2
2
3
3
1
4
1
3
1
1
3
4
4
1
1
3
4
1
3
3
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
3
3
1
3
Here's my result from the spreadsheet.
EII like the majority here.
Screenshot (201).png
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
can i have recalc pls???
Last edited by Kalinoche buenanoche; 10-13-2015 at 08:52 AM.
This test only gives you introvert's result, it's evil
@kalinoche, dl the excel spreadsheet, then 1st sheet is input and 2nd sheet is output (results)
and your results give 23% SEI and 30% IEI, all the others are way less than thoses two.
Last edited by Mega; 10-13-2015 at 08:39 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
