@Myst, maybe I didn't make it clear but this thread has reached it's end. I don't blame you for typing me ILI or whatever because that's the way I've come across at many times during this thread, but I am fairly certain that isn't my real type. I've mentioned why several times already.
As for the functions, yeah I said that I have a connection to Ne but how does it show up? I've re-read this thread after learning more and my posts are littered with Ne-polr.
I think Ne PoLR is best described as an inability to visualize and describe all the "could be's" and "might be's" and a deep running insecurity when the ESI/LSI gets pulled out into this zone.
The difference between LSI and ESI Ne PoLRs is that ESI doesn't consider positive future potential while the LSI doesn't consider negative potential. Thus ESI runs him/herself into a corner and begins complaining about not seeing a positive future, while the LSI keeps running around making mistakes and getting bruises from life, and also complains about how life is bringing him down.Originally Posted by ResonareAs for Ni-ego, you really make me laugh here. You talk about going by trends but ignore them yourself.Originally Posted by Resonare
> @Maritsa points out that I don't seem like an Ni-ego type.
> @Simo points out my unusually high Se for an ILI.
> I don't relate to many aspects of being an Ni-ego type e.g. far future thinking, wandering mental landscapes etc
> @Deer Woman sees static Se-valuing and suggests ESI
> I don't relate to the "Victim" Romantic Style.
So take your own advice. You can read this post to see my relationship to the rest of the functions, but as for Se-DS I'll just point out that I'm not even going to entertain your views on this if you can't even see how depression can come across like it.
So again, this thread has reached it's end. I'm not listening to someone who is so hypocritical that they say "Don't go by specific examples" only to ask for specific examples in the very same fucking post Myst. I got a feeling you were being biased when you ignored that 1D Ni post and it seems I was right.
Thanks for the help but your "input" is no longer wanted.