None of your points seemed contradictory to Pseudo-Aggressor to me, ha.
Maybe some other Pseudo-Aggressors, like @
Narc and @
Adam Strange can chime in on that issue.
In the meantime, I'll just quote Gulenko himself: "
Pseudo-Aggressors/Employees: LIE (ENTj) ILI (INTp)
These are types who exhibit aggressive tendencies in their everyday life, and as a result tend to carry over these notions and temperaments into their romantic life. They typically are not comfortable with connotations of the word "victim" - implying a certain weakness, effeteness, and lack of dignity. In searching for a partner, they are looking for a worthy opponent - someone who is strong enough to withstand their quirks without "breaking" so to speak."
I'll concur with the previous conclusions of you being most likely an ILI, for the reasons the others have previously mentioned.
Your values are indeed primarily Gamma, and your Ethics are underdeveloped. Your
seems to be weak as it is the case for Ni leads. You lack the characteristics of both the Ej and Ij
temperaments. (Main reasons: Not "assertive" enough to be Ej, emotions too unstable to be Ij.) Your grasp on
related questions/issues was effortlessly strong. Opposed to most LII's, you did not shy away from
valuing questions, and do have an idea of right and wrong (even if not in a sophisticated manner as expected for
leads; but clearly valuing). You do seem to be
PoLR, in the way you are not clearly expressing emotions... generally, your answers in that sector seemed rather obscure, and simply not Fe seeking.
All in all, I also say: ILI.
I may need some more time to determine the subtype. It is possible you have no distinct one. A video could be helpful, but no pressure.