LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
They are the same types just explained through different phenomena. Who is to say that NiTe isn't really LI? Who is to say that NiTe is TP? I and a bunch of others just take it for granted that MBTI type = sociotype. Another example: Just because I call a cow, die Kuh, are they different? Don't be silly! As long as they come out the same, they are the same! ffs smh fml!
They aren't just the same types by different names. MBTI thinks about the I/E and J/P dichotomies rather differently than socionics, and there isn't really a 1-to-1 mapping between them. Though now as I write this, it occurs to me you may have been being sarcastic, in which case nevermind me.
Valued | Devalued
< | < | Conscious
< | < | Unconscious
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html