I hope most "victims" don't just lay there like dead fish.
http://www.girlsaskguys.com/sexual-h...ish-during-sex
http://www.thedatereport.com/dating/...-do-it-better/
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I took it as the blonde girl being IEI and the troublemaker being SLE. The troublemaker is shown as 'not a good girl', is my guess, which could imply Se-dom carelessness wrt acting 'ladylike'. She would fit the SLE stereotype of strong-headed and the blonde the stereotype of introverts not feeling good enough for extroverts, and of feeling the pull towards 'Se' but not knowing what to do with it, especially if she's never met a dual before.
The work has more to do with 'good, conservative person meets rebellious, bad person and they balance each other out'. An ESTx-INFx archetype, afaik.
Reason is a whore.
IEI's are not the picture of good and conservative though. While they're usually quite gentle and reserved in demenour, I wouldn't describe them as prudish and conservative at all - and in all describtions they are described as quite rebelious, looking for stimulation, often reckless, quickly bored and agressive/manipulative with people they're closed to (when they don't get their way). They certainly have a bite of an angsty teenager and are familiar with the dark side - far from pristine creatures.