Hence they (and you) are not IEI, fit the description god damn it!Originally Posted by SisOfNight
Since when, haha.
I know of IEIs who don't fit into that description.
Like... myself.
I slept 16hrs, I was a changed after the sleep, lost all of my hair and my dick grew longer by 5 inches. (and I've no idea why I had to talk about my penis)
... Because you are an Aggressor type?Haha.
This @SisOfNight is the closest to an IEI on this thread as I experience them.
Huh? I don't get it, haha.
I don't get your joke - I am a serious type, but I will explain.Huh? I don't get it, haha.
I know some IEIs. My experience with them, and even today for some hours is this: I get on well with them, they appreciate my humors and I appreciate their ability to lighten the ambience. There is a difference: when I talk there are more formalities and lightness. With EIIs (and IEEs) I can be more direct and less tactful. With the Delta NF, this is viewed as my being somewhat boisterous, but it is viewed as humorous and we communicate and get the job done.
With IEIs it is not as this: My Te is viewed not with the humor but as too rude and obtrusive.
Aware of this, with IEIs, I get on with them when I keep it light.
My observation here is that the other IEIs are rather cynical. You seem lighter and more willing to keep people getting on. Going by my experience, and my rationale explained. you are more IEI to me as I understand it, hence my comment to your thread, in a nutshell: you fit more so what Ni and Fe combined in this order in the ego block is described as, as is my experience and understanding.
Does this make sense to you?
Yes, now I got it.
I see what you mean. I seem to exude the "Merry" dichotomy more than some other self-typed IEIs in this forum. The ones you describe as "cynical" may actually be "Serious" like you are.
You may confuse those dichotomies (merry-serious) with instincts. Cynical is not serious and merry is not gregarious or light.Yes, now I got it.
I see what you mean. I seem to exude the "Merry" dichotomy more than some other self-typed IEIs in this forum. The ones you describe as "cynical" may actually be "Serious" like you are.
Well, it depends. I agree that So/Sx is "lighter" than Sx/Sp for example, generally. However, @Aylen is Sx/Sp and still seems more "merry" than some other people I've met on here.
I do think @spritelite has picked up on something...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
new season. <3
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Reply With Quote
