Aww.Originally Posted by Maritsa
Aww.
I know. Very sweet. When you are ready to find a dual I hope you too will find the one in your dreamsAww.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Haha. If I end up with a dual...I know. Very sweet. When you are ready to find a dual I hope you too will find the one in your dreams
Hopefully people are not going to attempt to type themselves or others based on a thread like this.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
It's not that, it's just it seems wrong to put a pic and say "beta duality", it's like I spin a 8 (4 if quadra dual) faced coin and hope it gets the right duality, it doesn't make sens.
Not at all, it's just not right lol, doesn't it hurt your brain to make unverified assumptions with confidence?Te valuing, much? Wrong thread for that, haha.
Last edited by Mega; 10-05-2015 at 11:25 AM. Reason: Math
I don't really see a problem with this thread. It is like the other ones on the instinctual variants.
Some posts will be very off, some will be very accurate. We are sharing ideas and discussing them. That's basically how it goes.
And I am actually seeing differences between the Duality Quadra threads. If it was true and everyone just posted their personal desires in them, the threads would all look the same.
But they don't. They seem to develop specific trends. I believe with enough good contributions, the overall idea of the threads will be mostly accurate.
Last edited by Olimpia; 10-05-2015 at 02:25 PM.
With the underlying assumption that the images posted first had the right "stereotyped" idea of the quadra. Which has the underlying assumption that each duality has general stereotyped vibe.I don't really see a problem with this thread. It is like the other ones on the instinctual variants.
Some posts will be very off, some will be very accurate. We are sharing ideas and discussing them. That's basically how it goes.
And I am actually seeing differences between the Duality Quadra threads. If it was true and everyone would just post their personal desires in them, the threads would all look the same.
But they don't. They seem to develop specific trends. I believe with enough good contributions, the overall idea of the threads will be mostly accurate.
IMO, the duality images have more to do with fucking enneagrams (because it relate to real world stuff and how you act in your world) than fucking socionics.
Funny thing is that Augusta created socionics in the first place because she thought there was something somewhere that had a correlation with social types, for exemple the nerd, the hardworker, and so on. For that she used IM that describes how you understand the world and how you understand how you fit in that world. That's a big ass fucking assumption to begin a fucking theory on, IMO.
So... why exactly are you a member of a Socionics forum?
P.S: I have seen the Romance Style apply to each Socionics type across Enneagram types. No matter what the IEI's Enneagram type was, they were still a Victim Romance Style deep down. Etc.
Don't ask lol, to pass time I suppose, and sometimes the forum is fun (but still, it's a good question to ask yourself)So... why exactly are you a member of a Socionics forum?
That's weird man. Fuck that shit man. It seems so much pulled out from someone's ass (the whole personality theory stuff) that it seems crazy to have some truth somewhere.
You are making non-factual assumptions yourself about the motives of people posting here
You're no Alpha NT for sure lol
If I didn't write that line I'm unsure I'd have gotten an answer to my post.You are making non-factual assumptions yourself about the motives of people posting here
IIRC, I said it had no relation whatsoever with Socionics. Moreover, why is that so?
Reply With Quote
