Once i did Coke (diet coke)
Once i did Coke (diet coke)
Only racoonationally.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
I don't, but my cat does errryday (get high on catnip).
made me look up which other animals besides us do drugs - http://www.cracked.com/article_17032...han-we-do.html
http://usvsth3m.com/post/71973683394...off-their-tiny
Yes. Mostly weed and MDMA. I didn't do any hard drugs at all until last year, now I seem to do MDMA every other weekend.
ἀταραξία
Miley Cyrus, you've ruined our youth.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Dudes, I did every drug in the book except heroine.
It's fun in the beginning, but stop it after a year or two, and find other friends. that's my advice. Cause hangovers get worse, real worse.
Also xtc is cool and pretty harmless, but coke is boring and very expensive and addictive. only con's and no pro's. so never mind that boring stuff.
In Europe there have been 2 large scale researches done around 15 types of drugs. The results even came on tv etc.
I remember they looked at 3 aspects, addictive, physical problems, social problems.
In the first study xtc was 13th bad of the 15. On the second study it had a similar place. Even weed was rated as more destructive than xtc.
Alcohol, heroine and cocaïne were all in the top 3 in both studies as being the most destructive drugs.
I used to do (illegal) drugs on an almost daily basis, but I stopped after I had a bad trip one time. Well, it wasn't a bad trip in the sense that I couldn't handle myself, but rather, I inexplicably passed out and had a grand mal seizure. It was an especially weird reaction considering it was only psilocybin. I took that as my cue from the universe to focus on my GPA instead. But now, I have to take medications, including opiates and muscle relaxers, every day for health reasons.
If there were no research of chronic psychical problems (fatigability, degradation of attention, affective disorders, sociopathic behavior, etc) after intensive using drugs, then that researches are useless. While to forbid something there were researches too. And they were done with government control, but not by just dontknowwho wich may get money from drug dealers and say anything. Previously there was case with "safe" tobacco. Even in case of government control I'd doubt in some degree as people at power like to say "there are to many humans".
At least they were honest to say it's bad, but not safe.In the first study xtc was 13th bad of the 15
As you may understand this depends on quantity and frequence. Consequences for typical systematic user of cocaine/heroine/forbidden drug and typical user of alcohol are fundamentaly different. If they say cocaine/heroine used in such way give similar problems to health as alcohol, and extasy give less problems - they say evident bullshit and their "study" is an advertising for drugs at "safer" end, as I've suspected.Alcohol, heroine and cocaïne were all in the top 3 in both studies
The manipulation scheme is: you see most people get alcohol from time to time and think to get a forbidden drug is similarly ok too, for some drugs even more ok than alcohol. You don't think that the destructive effect of typical dose of forbidden drug is rather more than of typical dose of alcohol. Don't think that forbidden drugs are rather more addictive and it's much harder to don't get more and more, not to go to other drugs. Don't think that even a single dose of some drugs may have long negative effects. Don't think that there is no normal control how drugs are made and you may get overdose or be poisoned, or your body will have nonstandard reaction. I studied with a guy who died after a drug on a party - he was only 21 years old.
Want to get more adequate data about drugs - read medical book, general psychiatry or narcology section. There you'll find descriptions what happens with those who think some drugs are safe in a typical form of their use.
Last edited by Sol; 09-27-2015 at 03:12 PM.
Dude your whole text makes it sounds as if the research was done by a couple of amateur students who had all kinds of hidden agenda's or worked for an alcohol company. These were serious studies issued by the government in which all of your remarks probably have passed the minds of the researchers a 100 times. Also I never said anything was harmless, i said 'pretty harmless'.
recycling an image.
or maybe both.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Drugs I've tried:
Marijuana, Ritalin/ADHD pills (Does this count, since I don't have ADHD? Hah.), MDMA, and Cocaine.
I really want to try both acid and shrooms sometime, at least once.
No, it just seems like it sometimes.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits