Typology student here, yet to immerse myself in Socionics. This is the place I've scoped out to do so at.
Nice to meet you, see you on the forums, suck my ass, etc.
Typology student here, yet to immerse myself in Socionics. This is the place I've scoped out to do so at.
Nice to meet you, see you on the forums, suck my ass, etc.
To study typology you need to know your own type. Make a typing video for this.
Hi troll!
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
sucking on ass is odd lol NUTz may be another thing hahaha
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Nostalgia playstation metal gear solid.
They say the first impression is the best. GODDAMNED what do i like this guy.
If he's a heterosexual atheist republican, that would be even more awesome.
why am i tagged in this thread
to see you question it, perhaps
good bye
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
aylen has evolved into a spam bot
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
welcome to the 16t.
Maybe someday, I will step out of the shadows of internet anonymity and bare my face and soul for public scrutiny.
But that day is not today.
I'm a level 100 power lurker. Stealth is my armor, silent judgement my sword.
Also, life is busy.
I assure you, I come here with nothing but the sincerest of intentions.
I must admit I've only played MGS3. My plan is to go through the series in the order of the games' timeline.
Up next: The first Metal Gear Solid on a PS1 emulator.
The callgirls in hell will be plentiful. I'll show myself there.
You got 2 out of 3 right. I'm largely apolitical but predisposed towards leftism if forced to have an opinion.
No damn clue. The forces that rule this place must've intended for this meeting to happen. Resign yourself to fate.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Got tagged for this thread for some reason. Well anyhow, welcome to the madImean "Fun" house .
You may leave your anonymity with you. Only your video is needed for typing, not your name or any personal data.
It's same like you talk with people on a street. 10 min of your talk about rather general things -> some resonable probability to type you. No video = no resonable probability to type you. No resonable probability to type you -> senseless loss of time on this forum.
Hmm, noted. Either way I would be proceeding with the first title.
The cameras and controls in Snake Eater were beyond retarded and a great source of frustration, so it's difficult to imagine how the prequels could be worse in this regard. The corridor style levels of Sons of Liberty seem way more suited for the controls and forced perspectives than the large open jungle areas of its sequel, for which a streamlined camera á la Splinter Cell would've been an enormous improvement. The number of fuckups because I couldn't see more than 15 feet ahead of me caused innumerable rage quits.
You seem to be operating under a a few strange assumptions, namely that one can't correctly self-type and has to rely on others for a true type assessment, and that learning the theory is useless before you know your type. Is this correct?
Last edited by Cop; 09-07-2015 at 08:50 PM.
actually I think it was @Satan who did it
he seems to have tagged me in a few threads for some reason