Evil is a choice so if zombified they are unable to make that choice. They are fueled by an instinct to survive, which is not inherently evil.
Evil is a choice so if zombified they are unable to make that choice. They are fueled by an instinct to survive, which is not inherently evil.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Evil is subjectiveOriginally Posted by Aylen
Mmhmm, a tiger is not evil for killing it's prey although the villagers might not see it that way.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Maybe the villagers were evil for allowing the circumstance for it to kill.
Anyway, the moral of the story far as I'm concerned is this: less finger pointing more personal responsibility.
To use your example, the tiger protected itself, and it's young by feeding them, the villagers... got careless then blamed something else other than themself
So for villagers... Some ego involved
Then we move to loose the ego and move to Buddhism. If it gets bad enough we behead ourselves and become zombies, the circle of the thread is complete.
what about zombie H*tler?
So, you got me thinking... I did some research...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
That is like calling a lion evil.
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote