LSE final
LSE final
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Is final absolute?
Oh boy... actually girl. You must be the queen of forum.
LOL It's my new system. It used to be that I would type then I'd think about it and wasn't so sure so I had to use some phrase that would shut that door as to compartmentalize things and keep them in the "done" compartment and that phrase became "Final." It doesn't have pretentious connotationsOriginally Posted by Capp
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You remind me of my ENTp friend when it comes to VI. Also, you vibe extroverted to me. You could be ESTj or "logical" ESFj though. How old are you btw? Welcome to the forum
That's not good Ni. Ni in relation to time would be more related to knowing the "right timing" than action planning, imo. Ni as intuition of time is a pretty lame way to describe it anyway and leads to confusion.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Have you looked through type examples threads stickied in each quadra? One way to find your base quadra is to look through the videos of people of different types & read through some discussion threads in that quadra, meanwhile gauging which videos and discussions feel more understandable and relatable to yourself, and which feel quixotic and different.
For a practical exercise can you write out in detail how you relate to each point of these two dichotomies?
http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...ry_and_serious
http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...s_and_dynamics
(these are 'base level' ones)
Te is planned action
Ni forecasts and can be relatively sure of what will happen with certain events in the future; if you often find yourself saying "I don't know what the future holds" or "I don't know what will happen in the future with [any number of things]" then you can't use that type of reasoning to arrive at even a guess or it may be that guessing (as a realist type) isn't a satisfactory answer for you.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I will suprise you. I understood that
hahahahaI will suprise you. I understood that
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I thought the same actually but wasn't sure if it was a language barrier or not.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Why?you vibe extroverted to me
Rare, but yes. Actually, my thoughts about it are not always stupid.Ni forecasts and can be relatively sure of what will happen with certain events in the future
Beta is blunt, Delta are pussies. I was told that I'm from Beta quadra because of my sanse of humour, taste and outlook.For a practical exercise can you write out in detail how you relate to each point of these two dichotomies?
Dichotomies:
Statics / Dynamics - no idea
Merry / Serious - Merry? :| Only a little bit more than serious
<Attention whore mode on!> My final form!
But I don't know my sociotype. Maybe I can make a video? Of course I can, but is it really important for typing or just bullshit? If video can help, maybe write some questions you want me to answer? I'm waiting.
Are you observant of people's actions and behaviors? Do you judge them? Please provide examples
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah kinda sounds like Te but not conclusive
So you don't like to analyse things with Ti?
I really don't have a better source than http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...Dmitry-Golihov:| Not really. I just want to know how human with "always on" Se, Si, Te, Ti (and I guess Ni and Ne now) functions look.
Breaking free, this for the Fe environment?
So you never have issues with how long something will take?
Yes. Or Se. I do crazy stuff with friends.Breaking free, this for the Fe environment?
Sometimes I have problems, but little and future pictures in my mind happens later.So you never have issues with how long something will take?
How it works and is?So you don't like to analyse things with Ti?
Are you asking what Ti is?
Yeah, kind of, but now I know what is Ti clearly.
This is usually unnecessary. I do that only when really needed.So you don't like to analyse things with Ti?
Last edited by Capp; 02-11-2015 at 05:58 PM.
So how do you type yourself now?
LIE/ILI/LSE, possibly ILE
Maybe do a short video in your native language. The way you would normally talk. I see you are struggling here. If you do one in your language most won't understand but it will be easy to see the way you flow. I think there are a few who speak it though.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
There are other videos on my channel where I speak in polish, you can check it out.
You seem kinda angry or confrontational, do you like rap music?
HahaYou seem kinda angry or confrontational, do you like rap music?
I prefer drum'n bass.
But I'm a little shitty ******.
So uh how much do you relate to Ti?
Te > Ti
Ti still strong, but not in ego block.
I have finished typing. Ty all.
LIE works very well for you. ..I'm glad you saw your Te. And to all those who didn't. ...really? You people might consider reareading the functions...
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote