Results 1 to 40 of 421

Thread: Correlations between Socionics and Enneagram types (old discussions)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,684
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Inversed Sociotype-Enneagram correlations:

    Scale:

    3: Best fit
    2: Possible
    1: Pretty much impossible

    1

    3: LSI, LII, EII
    2: ESI, EIE
    1: Everything else

    2

    3: ESE, SEI
    2: ESI, IEE, IEI, EII, EIE
    1: Everything else

    3

    3: EIE
    2: IEI, ESE, ILE, SLE, LIE
    1: Everything else

    4

    3: IEI
    2: EIE, SEI, LII, ILI
    1: Everything else

    5

    3: ILI, LII
    2: SLI, ILE, LIE, LSI
    1: Everything else

    6

    3: ESI
    2: ILE, LII, ESE, SEI, LSI, IEI, EIE, SEE, ILI, LIE, SLI, EII, IEE
    1: SLE, LSE

    7

    3: ILE, SLE, SEE, IEE
    2: ESE, EIE, SEI
    1: Everything else

    8

    3: SLE, LSE, LSI
    2: LIE, SLI, SEE, ESE
    1: Everything else

    9

    3: SEI, SLI,
    2: IEI, EII, IEE
    1: Everything else

    [Subject to change]
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  2. #2
    Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,168
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly View Post
    6

    3: ESI
    2: ILE, LII, ESE, SEI, LSI, IEI, EIE, SEE, ILI, LIE, SLI, EII, IEE
    1: SLE, LSE
    Why is it impossible for a Six to be an LSE, but impossible for a Six to be SLI?

  3. #3
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    Why is it impossible for a Six to be an LSE, but impossible for a Six to be SLI?
    SLI's can't be Sixes either. Such people who appear as Sixes are often Fours or Eights.

  4. #4
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    According to this, I'm an IEI. I like the other one better.

  5. #5
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 07490 View Post
    O
    Sorry, that's not a possible enneagram type. Must be an integer in the range of 1-9.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,577
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i'll respond to those parts that i really disagree with.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly View Post

    2

    3: ESE, SEI
    2: ESI, IEE, IEI, EII, EIE
    1: Everything else
    ESI, IEI, and EII would all probably make very poor twos.

    3

    3: EIE
    2: IEI, ESE, ILE, SLE, LIE
    1: Everything else
    LIEs would make atrocious 3s. i think an SEE would be a much better 3 than LIE, and maybe also LSI.

    4

    3: IEI
    2: EIE, SEI, LII, ILI
    1: Everything else
    SEI, LII, and ILI are all horrible 4s.

    5

    3: ILI, LII
    2: SLI, ILE, LIE, LSI
    1: Everything else
    i can't see an LSI as a good 5.

    6

    3: ESI
    2: ILE, LII, ESE, SEI, LSI, IEI, EIE, SEE, ILI, LIE, SLI, EII, IEE
    1: SLE, LSE
    all of SEI, SEE, ESE are probably poor sixes. i think i'd take LSE over any of them.

    8

    3: SLE, LSE, LSI
    2: LIE, SLI, SEE, ESE
    1: Everything else
    why is SLI or ESE a good 8? also LIE is at least as good as LSE, and ESI is at least as good as LSI.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •