There are so many subtype descriptions everywhere and everyone defines them differently. It seems these descriptions say that:
*program function subtype is more clearly EJ
*creative function subtype is so similar to the mirror that she's almost IP.

This used to be the thing that was talked about in the forum about a year ago, but I think it has changed into this:
*program function subtype has very obvious program function and they don't put so much emphasis on the role . The border between creative and PoLR however can be rather blurry. ENFj subtype borders with ESFj subtype and it can be difficult to tell the types apart. That's when we need to take a closer look at Reinin dichotomies, Gulenko sexual attitudes, general quadra values and relations. You won't really confuse the subtype with ESTj or ENTj.
*creative function subtype has very clear creative function and they are probably more likely to have problems with PoLR. The program and role can be rather blurry. Similar to ENTj subtype. Less likely to confuse with any type.

...................................
....... .. ............
.............\/..................
............./\..................
....... .. ............
...................................

subtype has equal and and weak
subtype has equal and and weak
both have EJ temperament, first one seems more extroverted.