Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Te in INTx

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,763
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Te in INTx

    What does an INTp have in their that an INTj doesn't have in their ?

  2. #2
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am really curious about this one, and the one as well...
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,968
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Depending on one's understanding of who the INTjs and INTps are, I'd say maybe the ability to explain things in clear logic that other people can understand, the ability to find alternate ways to do things if something doesn't work, and the ability to easily change their view to reflect new data. ....but let's remember that INTp isn't -dominant but -dominant.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,158
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it would be logically "cleanner" to compare contrary reltion pairs because it will show you a symetrical contrast between the functions where the functions perform the same task.
    -Slava


    What a great replacement for a nany

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •