Last edited by anndelise; 01-06-2015 at 04:31 PM.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
lol that one was cute. Looking at it again makes me all smiley.Originally Posted by anndelise
Links like these are very constructive to a typing thread. It gives a broader perspective on someone. One of the things I dislike about people typing each other is that they only see random posts/comments then try to use that to construct a personality type around someone without a lot of interaction. When I think I know someone's type, and I care enough to prove it to myself that I am right, I have to almost stalk them by reading their blogs and posts to see if I am getting the full picture. IOW I do my research...
It's nothing really personal about them, even though I may feel a draw to them, so i'm not a creeper, just curious about my own impressions. It is like, first I will get an impression then I set out to prove to myself that my impressions are right. I tend to keep most of them to myself in case I am wrong. New information about someone can equal a different perspective so it is always evolving. It is easier to type people I have known for years based on historical evidence leading to a pretty solid understanding of how I interact with them but even then people surprise me...
I have never had any problem seeing Galen as an aristocratic sx/sp.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
When I go to actually, seriously type someone, I do similar, only not looking to prove my impressions right, but more to see where i am wrong/right and/or need to adjust my perception of them. But yes, similar.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote