Jimmers you still seem SEI to me
Jimmers you still seem SEI to me
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I wouldn't take the Maritsa typings too seriously.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:17 AM.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:17 AM.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:17 AM.
Well I think, if you aren't against it or if you haven't done it already, you should make a video and have people type you off of that (or maybe submit one to WSS if you'd like). Videos aren't always super constructive, but, at the least, they can usually eliminate some of the options considered and maybe introduce some new ones. I think it should at least help to take either Fi dom or Ni dom off of the table.
while I don't see how I could be an Extroverted-judging type, I do have a choleric component. I'd say as temperament I'm a combo of phlegmatic-choleric, no matter how contradictory that may sound. But this may well be genetic. Or it could derive from Instinctual stack. You are probably sp/sx or sp/so.
By the way, why don't you post some pics at least...?
All I can say now is that you have that wise attitude towards life that one can see in Delta NFs... you are quite tolerant of people and you seem to have a diachronic perspective on them ... even from what you say you like about stories and characters (that could come from Ne as "intuition of potential", although I think Ni can also contribute to that). You have that "old soul" vibe I often sense in NFs.
Last edited by Amber; 12-14-2014 at 09:52 AM.
Based on your answers, you really sound like an ESI to me.
Description of ESI
I have a best friend that's a male ESI. We grew up together and have been hanging out for 12 years now.
We know everything about one another and you sound a lot like him.
I'm even living with a female ESI right now. She's my college roommate.
At first I thought of EII, but you lack the emotionality and self-poetisation EIIs do. Not to mention the Se directness and groundedness you have.
I also have 2 EII friends (people I hang out with, but don't consider best friends like the ESI): one male and one female, so I know the EII and ESI difference very well, allowing me to aliminate EII here.
Edit after reading thread: Haha it seems you agree with me.
Last edited by lapa83; 12-15-2014 at 11:48 AM.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:18 AM.
IEE - E9 ftw --- I'd get absolutely bored of change&merging with "others" if I were you.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:19 AM.
Based on what I've just read it's EII. Some answers ring a bell on what I'd say or said a while ago.
I very like your questionaire by the way . I don't want to be rude maybe you are right you can be another type. I have IEE friends and they are hyper. I don't think you are Ne type.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:20 AM.
I found the "TIM:LII" humorous while reading the questionnaire.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:20 AM.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:20 AM.
It is not about what LII could presents but what LII is expected to present and you lack. I expect LII to have some distance and analytical/critical approach to phenomena. You are headfirst in to phenomena and are all implicit about it.
Explicating things is pretty much a calling of the information metabolism type, so one would not pronounce not being able to do it all over the place even if having difficulty.
The juxtaposition and the offhandedness of it reveals you as a stranger to science, philosophy and argumentative discussion. Which would be at the minimum respected areas.
Retro/antique/whatever taste being posited as a reason to believe or not to believe something about the world. lmao
Seriously lining up these words would requires doing something awful to my mind. Explicitly that something being forcefully mixing categorically different things- belief and practice system and oranges.
LII might be religious and shit but some critical grain will cause one to be cagey or defensive or offensive(ready to push a detailed argument) about positions with huge claims.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:20 AM.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:21 AM.
Your mention didn't work. I got here now semi accidentally.
Because neuroscientists understand entire process.
Not really.
Scientists and philosophers talk about objects of the mind being representations/reflections of reality all the time.
So one could go after those objective properties that one reflects. Of course it will all be totally dependent on and entangled with value system. That then can be objectively consider as human nature or better yet as a nature of living being. So then you could be philosophizing and trying to understand and define beauty objectively but also pretty transcendentally as a facet of life.
That is an outline of analytical and constructive approaches. Constructive as in building structure of knowledge.(something Ti relates to)
What isn't analytical or constructive ~"Platonic essence of beauty shine upon me in thy mysticism!"
Tell us more about how everything feels like because that will make you fit in to the type better.
I am not particularly interested in what you believe in especially after knowing you take funny reasons to do so. The funny presented and presentation of reasoning being the argument for not fitting in to the type.
Nice one.
As already covered.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:21 AM.
.
Last edited by Skepsis; 09-05-2015 at 04:21 AM.