Quote Originally Posted by The Foundation View Post
LSI- would have much less emphasis on forcing the environment to conform to a degree of logical order (due to a less pronounced ), but would be much more concerned about how exactly order will be. LSI- would then seem more mental, from them trying to put everything in its proper place and ensuring everything in the outside world will meet the exact logical standard they have in their minds, whereas LSI- will be more pragmatic, realizing that sometimes the chaos of the external world can't be organized exactly how the mental model dictates. hidden agenda, then, plays a crucial role in providing the LSI with the motivation to build an elaborate mental schematic to force the world to adhere to. Whereas makes the LSI- more proactive in manipulating the environment to conform to , makes the LSI- more proactive in ensuring articulation of thought or hierarchy, in logical consistency and purity.
This refers to the internal standard LSI's are predicted to have for the world around them. is an organizational and categorical element, and thus it takes in physical perceptions from the world around the sociotype through Creative Se and constructs a model to organize and make sense of the data in front of them. Now, if the LSI is fed information from their Mobilizing element (), it would stand to reason that, in their zest of being apart of a bigger picture, they would attempt to systematize and organize the information into a working model, as all functions serve the Lead element's agenda, which is then applied to the physical world around them with Creative , essentially making the vision given to them "happen" by forcing the environment to organize itself in the fashion that tells them it should be..
Both of these quotes accurately describe the one LSI-Ti that I know. Very well articulated.

I have not identified any Se bases at this point, so can't comment on them.