Differences in Ni-HA for LSI-Se and LSI-Ti (ISTj)

[bolong]

I am generally somewhat wary of sub-type systems at the moment, but I will attempt to provide a possible analysis.

LSI- as you've stated, will probably be more aggressive and forceful to achieve a goal laid out for them. They more embody the archetypal "henchmen" or enforcer, in that their use of Creative in service to is much more emphasized than the other sub-type (theoretically). Creative in the LSI already is used as a tool to ensure logical order and definition is reached in the external environment, but when there is stimulation to the Mobilizing , they become susceptible to adhering to causes or movements and acting as their executors (performers, assets) in the real world. Thus, LSI- would be much more about forcing the environment in front of them to adhere to their standard of logical order which is motivated by their desire to help bring about a grander scheme ( feeds feeds ).

LSI- would have much less emphasis on forcing the environment to conform to a degree of logical order (due to a less pronounced ), but would be much more concerned about how exactly order will be. LSI- would then seem more mental, from them trying to put everything in its proper place and ensuring everything in the outside world will meet the exact logical standard they have in their minds, whereas LSI- will be more pragmatic, realizing that sometimes the chaos of the external world can't be organized exactly how the mental model dictates. hidden agenda, then, plays a crucial role in providing the LSI with the motivation to build an elaborate mental schematic to force the world to adhere to. Whereas makes the LSI- more proactive in manipulating the environment to conform to , makes the LSI- more proactive in ensuring articulation of thought or hierarchy, in logical consistency and purity.

First of all, LSI as a "henchman" is completely wrong and missing the essence of this personality type. Second, how do you come up with all this stuff if you're not even sure you fully buy into subtypes. Like, no type behaves this way ("build an elaborate mental schematic to force the world to adhere to"), or maybe it's because I hate Te that I'm resisting this explanation, because things only make sense to me in comparison of other similar things. I.E. people behave like people, until you observe two different reactions to the same situation. Then you conclude that huh, this guy X holds his ground and reaches his goal, this guy Y kind of fucked everything up. There's my limited logic for you.

But to answer OP, I have no idea.

[Mega]

First of all, LSI as a "henchman" is completely wrong and missing the essence of this personality type. Second, how do you come up with all this stuff if you're not even sure you fully buy into subtypes. Like, no type behaves this way ("build an elaborate mental schematic to force the world to adhere to"), or maybe it's because I hate Te that I'm resisting this explanation, because things only make sense to me in comparison of other similar things. I.E. people behave like people, until you observe two different reactions to the same situation. Then you conclude that huh, this guy X holds his ground and reaches his goal, this guy Y kind of fucked everything up. There's my limited logic for you.

But to answer OP, I have no idea.

Don't you live with an LSI?

[bolong]

Don't you live with an LSI?

I do, Se-subtype.