borrowing this video from wacey for this thread because its content sounded so so/sx ... "the social nexus"
borrowing this video from wacey for this thread because its content sounded so so/sx ... "the social nexus"
I decided Flo Rida vibes so/sx to me. It is all light and whimsical even sexual references. Nothing really raw like sx/so can be. He gives me that feeling of when you're outta sight you're outta mind. I don't like that.I think Pitbull comes off more raw and may be sx/so even though some of his songs are so/sx.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
that also irritates me with other so/sx and makes it difficult to get close to them sometimes (even when we get along otherwise). even though they are much more discriminate with their interpersonal bonds than they actually let on and fiercely protective of them. with the few so/sx i know more closely it's pretty obvious where their loyalities lie (their boyfriend/girlfriend, the best friend <- which means a lot!, significant people in their life, etc) these special bonds are pretty much meant to last forever (even if it doesn't work out) and are always on their mind (blindspot is sp. the bonds to other people mean literally everything.)Originally Posted by Aylen
Last edited by lynn; 12-13-2015 at 08:08 PM.
Last edited by Default; 10-03-2015 at 03:40 AM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Bliss N Eso - Addicted - so/sx, Beta
Bliss N Eso - The Sea is Rising
Last edited by silke; 10-31-2015 at 10:44 AM.
Three women from Momence Illinois 1890’s
the polyamorous unicorn movement - NF so/sx (their founder is most likely EIE-Fe)
That movement is totally crazy NF Delta, haha. (Too much Ne valuing, whoo. Too much Fi valuing. Too little Se-Ti valuing.)
The leader is IEE-Fi Sx/So E7.
Just as a disclaimer, this movement is not So/Sx at all, haha! The entire movement is contra-flow, Sx/So.
So/Sx does not engage in movements that are... going against the grain like that. So/Sx is not "weird" like contra-flow.
So/Sx has an element of conformity to it, in some way or another. (No wonder they are usually attuned to pop-culture.)
So/Sx, if at all, tends to pick a movement that is already existing. Sx/So creates new movements that go against any previous ones, and/or are in stark contrast to already existing ones.
You could say Contraflow is controversial on purpose, whereas Synflow is controversial by accident (happens rarely) or not at all.
Besides, Polyamory just screams Sx/So. The focus is on Sex and connection/relationships (Sx) with many different partners (So).
I don't know any So/Sx person who has ever cared for Polyamory strongly, may it be positively or negatively.
Polyamory fans and haters are usually Sx/So alike.
Last edited by Olimpia; 10-31-2015 at 12:50 PM.
I feel like speaking up on behalf of So/Sx people, because it is generally assumed (for whatever reason) that Polyamory must be So/Sx, which is false.
As I have said, Synflow tends to be "inherently human", meaning they do rarely endorse movements or actions beyond what doesn't (bene)fit most people (So dom).
Whereas Sx/So is all about creating new movements, going "against humanity" (including "most people").
Polyamory is all about having sex and relationships how you want, there is no main focus on society at large, like it is the case for So/Sx.
Polyamory is essentially usually about an intimate group of people having sex with each other. It is a secluded, "contra-group" in a sense: Sx/So.
So/Sx tends to want to include "everyone" to some degree.
All in all, Polyamory is simply an SX/SO ideal/nightmare.
SO/SX does not really care.
Last edited by Olimpia; 10-31-2015 at 06:42 PM.
I feel like this music (video) is most likely "real" So/Sx.
It also speaks to me strongly.
I'd say the SO dom focus is undeniable. Putting "love" into the equation seems like secondary Sx.
Besides, this also seems to be rather Beta Quadra. (All of those aspects lacking in the Polyamory video/movement, IMO.)
P.S: I have come to the realization "The Black Eyed Peas" are very likely a Beta band.
I used to really like them when I was younger.
imo, the band consists of so/sx, sx/sp and sp/so (in that order in the video). there's a strong sp influence (the whole environmental issues which are addressed in the song). i think the whole song is more of a combination of syn-flow values than a purely so/sx mindset.
This YT channel is extremely So/Sx.
I don't know the types of the musicians, but theese songs seem so/sx to me:
I think so too - one of their vocalists may as well be sx/sp - generally I find bands who manage to reach an audience will in some way hit upon all 3 instincts.
Nneka - so/sx (EIE-Fe?) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nneka_(singer)
Last edited by silke; 12-24-2015 at 08:04 AM.
Does this article represent the so/sx views?--The Case for Getting Rid of Borders—Completely
Last edited by lynn; 01-19-2016 at 11:53 PM.
Last edited by lynn; 12-09-2015 at 07:26 AM.
Last edited by lynn; 01-19-2016 at 11:53 PM.
.
Last edited by lynn; 04-30-2016 at 10:49 AM.
Do you have an sx/so version of this pic?
Julius Schmid - Wood Nymphs in the Moonlight
What do you mean?
Like, an Sx/So nymph picture?
Btw, I have just uploaded an Sx/So picture in the other thread, you might want to check that one out. It is like a modern Sx/So version of the above pic.
This show.
There actually is such a thing as stackings. Enneagram is not chakra energies. That is just myth.
I am so/sx/sp actually.
I used to be sp/sx/so.
My partner is sx/sp/so
So it is quite saddening. We don't agree on things anymore.
I wonder how I can change my stackings.
I want to be ISTp.
sp/sx
These people often have an earthy, mysterious quality to them. They are slow to commit, but once they do it is with an attitude of life commitment, to the establishment of an impermeable bond. Others can be taken aback by how suddenly and completely this type can lock into them, and by the depth of understanding of the other’s condition. They attach to others at an organic, root level, in contrast to the other subvariant’s surface formality. The sanctuary of home is of paramount concern, and this type takes particular delight in decorating their spaces to reflect their cherished sense of taste and depth. Depth and discrimination characterize this stacking.
Motivation: to live in a secure, comfortable environment where they can pursue their private interests in depth.
I wouldn't know. I don't think @Sol our only dual here now knows either. How ?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I thought you were my dual?
You look like it
I want to be ISTp.
sp/sx
These people often have an earthy, mysterious quality to them. They are slow to commit, but once they do it is with an attitude of life commitment, to the establishment of an impermeable bond. Others can be taken aback by how suddenly and completely this type can lock into them, and by the depth of understanding of the other’s condition. They attach to others at an organic, root level, in contrast to the other subvariant’s surface formality. The sanctuary of home is of paramount concern, and this type takes particular delight in decorating their spaces to reflect their cherished sense of taste and depth. Depth and discrimination characterize this stacking.
Motivation: to live in a secure, comfortable environment where they can pursue their private interests in depth.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
