An 'edgy' ILE.
Not a SLE by a long shot.
At least the SLE's I know would never say something like this lol:
Ne base and infantile. ILE imo.Welcome. We've been expecting you. Now that you've been infected with the airborne pestilence of dark magic that infests this place, the natives back home will smell this scent and reject you.
Now, abandon all hope, ye who enter, for this is the realm of the damned! The dead have made it...the dead keep it.
You are one of us now. I dub thy dark name Chaubunagungamaug.
Edit: oh, and probably 7w6 (or 6w7).
Last edited by darya; 10-05-2014 at 02:49 PM.
ILE 6w7 sx/so...first post on this thread (and overall energy) comes across too exhibitionistic for sx/sp...almost every sentence contains peacocking
sx/so types go beyond just describing themselves into trying too hard to project a quality they possess out into the social 'ether'...also notice repetition of themes.
sx/sp is more contained and less imagey....more grounded and not as subversive...also not as easy to mistake for NF at first glance the way sx/so is...
leaning more towards 3w4 > 4w3 in tritype.
Yeah, ofc, 6w7, not 7w6. With 6's I for some reason always imagine cp 6w5 guy and a phobic 6w7 girl
Now I'm gonna like or constructivate your future posts. (Woof.)
And ...
I prefer the IEI guess for the OP. A lot to construe as Ni in the questionnaire responses. 2d Ti makes sense imo, it doesn't really flow or take up objective external matters like I think 3d or 4d does.
Last edited by golden; 10-05-2014 at 08:27 PM.
You killed Ebola??? AWESOME.
Sorry I have no input on your type, though.
Obviously this person has no interest in getting typed and plays hide-and-seek in a rather Victimy way. I'm out, who cares about his type, I don't want extra derails in this childish thread.
Possible Kurt Cobain eyes. I'm sticking with IEI barring further info.
you have daniel day lewis eyes
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah, I can see that too.
Haha, so it seems he's really putting all the things mentioned about him in his TIM. Maybe I haven't been paying attention to this thread but EIE seemed mentioned recently and only based on your avatar. Come on, bro. I guess your openness is cool though.
Daniel Day Lewis And Kurt Cobain are Nai'Xyy (NiFe) so he is also Nai'Xyy!
*does Pod'lair Nai'Xyy sign*
One of Us, One of Us.
Your inner tension is hilarious to me, I don't mean to laugh at your pain or anything but it's like you were made by Gay Shaman Sugary Unicorn Disney Fairies yet you hate yourself for it, your avatar is like this really emotional person trying to break through out of their emoness but they just can't. You're like tart licorice.
Unicorns can be mad too.
wtf u look completely different from your self description
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I could buy IEI or EIE-Ni on drugs.
Last edited by Persephone; 10-10-2014 at 11:46 AM. Reason: Typo
I vote for IEI still. You're cute. It's a bit of a Salvador Dali look, but without the laser edge.
Not necesarily, it's usually out of politeness and empathy. I don't think you understand the IM's quite correctly.Feelers don't obey rules because they're rules. They listen to people because they genuinely like them.
Btw, I'm sorry for the sarcasm, I wasn't trying to be rude to you personally It's just that your Fi-Polr is visible from outer space.
And I see you decided you're EIE for yourself due to your signature, so I wanted to correct this mistake lol.
I personally think you're ILE and not SLE, but as long as you don't type yourself EIE I'm all good. You seem cute in a zany way
ILE's can be agressive and are imo the most Beta seeming non-Beta type - they often have very Beta-like values (it depends on an ILE though). SLE's and ILE's are not called look-a-likes for nothing. Also, you don't have to be Se ego to be agressive.I don't think I'm an ILE either because they have an even easier time regulating their emotions than SLEs even though both are Logicals. SLEs just dump aggression all over you, ILEs will be more passive-aggressive.
I just don't think you're a sensor at all . Plus no offense, but you also don't seem like an agressor
let's just say by your type change frequency, I wouldn't be surprised if you were a rather unsettled EIE-Ni sp-last wanderer. You vibe super-Beta anyway.
Gu...lanzon?